Then, why wasn't evidence uncovered earlier? Surely the theory had just as much plausibility a year ago as today.
Are you asking me to believe a theory for which all the evidence was either not uncovered or destroyed? Why is that more plausible than origin from outside the lab?
I mean, isn't that obvious? The Chinese did not allow anyone to investigate WIV because they don't want to be blamed.
I agree that conclusions should not be drawn without evidence - but by the same token, you cannot rule this out as a possibility because no effort was put into investigating it.
Are you asking me to believe a theory for which all the evidence was either not uncovered or destroyed? Why is that more plausible than origin from outside the lab?