Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

don't focus on the features of the product - focus on the team. it might end up being something completely different (there is a word for that)

from the perspective of 'can these guys spin a $40M investment into something that is worth more?', the answer is probably yes (probably enough to worth investing in)

it isn't a bubble because this is still VC money, not crazy mom and pop shooting at the NASDAQ money. during the bubble this company would have already IPO'd and been worth $5B, and you parents would have called you up to ask about it.



Cuil had Googlers behind it. The people behind it can make a difference if the other fundamentals (market viability especially) are in place.

Is there a $40m+ market for a group photo album app? This app is free, so they'll need a great monetization model even if the market is there.


For $40M+ investment it should be $1B+ market. I guess they probably pitched something, like: "COLOR - the Facebook for Mobile"


Cuil was trying to solve a problem that was already solved, and they were so arrogant in their media briefs you could just tell that they were on another planet

Color, on the other hand, if they at least solve the problem of figuring out where somebody is I can see someone paying 200M+ for that (fb or google)


The team behind it makes the work I've seen so far all the more surprising. Have you played with the app? It's horrible. It's really bad. It's not fun to use--it's confusing and frustrating. The UI is a nightmare. It's buggy. I know some of those things can be smoothed out over time, but it doesn't feel like those early apps you see that have tons of promise but a few rough edges. As an investor, I'd be worried.


I'd probably never install the app, but then I don't even use a smartphone - but they have enough money to make this mistake 10 times over

who knows, they might end up powering location for foursquare, facebook, and google etc. in 3 years time as the new GPS.


From everything I read, Color has a fantastic team and the Techcrunch article is actually pretty positive on the idea. I'm sure that the company will succeed.

But saying a company will likely succeed and deserves an investment does not mean VCs shouldn't be making rational valuations based on real business metrics. And as the OP remarked, this is probably funding at a $80m+ valuation for a company with no product (when funded), no revenue, and plenty of competition.


Right, this puts their valuation above those of already very successful companies.


Actually it puts their valuation around the same that Lala was purchased for!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: