Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Maybe those people telling you to limit screen time have different observations than you. It really depends on the individual child and my wife and I have first-hand experience with both ends of the spectrum.

One of my kids thrives on screen time because she actively seeks out creative and informative non-passive activities. She is in control of her technology usage rather than the other way around. And even though we keep tabs on her, we trust her completely to manage her own time.

The other gets limited screen time because if we don't put strict limits on it, he has absolutely immense self-control issues. He throws temper tantrums, claims to be bored all the time, picks arguments with others, refuses to follow simple instructions, and won't stay in bed for anything at bed time. Put simply: he displays all the hallmarks of chemical addiction with even a moderate amount of daily screen time. All of this is greatly decreased and comes very close to being a model citizen when we reduce his screen time down to only that which is required for his school work.

And somewhere in there is the fact that human adolescent brains were not designed by evolution to sit indoors all day look at screens or books.



> Maybe those people telling you to limit screen time have different observations than you. It really depends on the individual child and my wife and I have first-hand experience with both ends of the spectrum.

But for those observations, is the problem the screen or what is on the screen? As a society, I'd like us to focus less on the former and more on the latter.

A screen is just a window that become anything, and I don't see why it should be inherently more or less educative than any other experience.

Let's say in the future we get perfect VR headsets that can perfectly replicate every sense. Would the conversation be different?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: