I was trying to stay in context with how you originally phrased your response of..
"There is no reason to believe BTC will not crash that's more solid than people smiling knowingly and saying "it can't, it's the future". It's not, though."
This quote implies that BTC lacks long term value, which again I argue that BTC does have long term value for reasons previously stated. Certainly, I understand that sharp declines in value are often described as crashes.
In regards to the term "traditional economy", I actually meant to insert the words "integrated with", so the start of the sentence should have read "This is what I mean by integrated with the traditional economy..."; just an error on my part. The point I'm making is that the integration with the traditional economy is occurring on the backend finance side and adds legitimate value and use to Bitcoin over many other cryptocurrencies.
In regards to the term "traditional economy", I actually meant to insert the words "integrated with", so the start of the sentence should have read "This is what I mean by integrated with the traditional economy..."; just an error on my part. The point I'm making is that the integration with the traditional economy is occurring on the backend finance side and adds legitimate value and use to Bitcoin over many other cryptocurrencies.