Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Musk didn't found Tesla and is (somewhat inappropriately) labeled as a cofounder, but joined in Series A as an investor.

But he very much did build SpaceX from nothing (well, his Paypal money), and his unconventional approach is responsible for their success.



Musk absolutely should take credit for Tesla as it exists today.

The Tesla he bought into was just a research project. It was nowhere near the global brand it is today nor were they on a trajectory that would have put them anywhere close to where they are today. It was his vision that made it possible at all.

Similar to the founding story of McDonald's. Ray Croc bought the idea and made McDonald's what it is today. He didn't actually start the original 6 burger restaurants named McDonald's.


I agree that Musk was very impactful for Tesla, and it would most likely be nowhere near where it is today without him.

My only complaint is that he is not a cofounder, but joined in Series A as an investor.


It's also questionable whether Tesla Motors would have had the same impact (or even survived) without Musk's efforts and leadership. They were making a very niche sports car at the time that was basically hand built. Musk is the one that got them to a mainstream commercial product.


There's almost 100% chance it would have failed, I doubt they could have found a more dedicated and driven person to take it through its darker times.


Fine, but when do we stop assigning money and drivers as co-founders? You can look at situation like Lee Iacocca did the same thing for Chrysler, but he wasn't labeled as a co-founder.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: