Actual TM is "GOPH Gopher Protocol" but title would have been too long. This looks very odd to me, coincidence with recent Gopher (the old protocol) revival attempts or something fishy going on?

It is curious. The company website for Gopher Protocol Inc. says very little in a lot of words.

It reads like they want to impress investors with buzzwords and acronyms, in the hope that they're daft enough fall for it.

Such gems as: "In order to manage the complexity of the system, Gopher is using validation techniques and methodologies in which functionality is verified by simulating and validating processes according to the system's description."

Also: "The hardware (CPU, RTC, more) and on-board software need to be synchronized together in order to execute a decision when to listen, go to sleep, wake up or remain in idle state."

I suppose that any increase in search traffic for 'Gopher Protocol' might get conveniently, though incorrectly, attributed to their company, which they can take to investors of a gullible disposition.