Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I greatly enjoyed this comment and the subthread it inspired.

For the peanut gallery: never give anyone in an extension in writing; your ask should be for immediate performance.

Why? Well, there are a lot of varieties of "performance" which aren't happy outcomes for you. Should you give someone an extension to their deadline and have them perform in a way which is displeasing to you, the default is they do not have a regulatory infraction if you complain [0]. Should someone blow their deadline and then perform and then have you complain to the regulator, they basically always have a regulatory infraction regardless of whether their performance is satisfactory, so their incentive is do whatever possible to prevent the complaint.

[0] Situation dependent, obviously, but lots of regulatory regimes will have an escape hatch like "unless agreed to by the customer" or "unless agreed to by the counterparty in writing."



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: