No, I'm not. For one, I've never used it. The parent comment was referring to how they provided endpoints for programs connecting through open protocols, and now that they have some sort of critical mass, just dismissing the users of the service that utilize it through those. And my comment supports the viewpoint that we fall in for UX and convenience and low/no cost, then get screwed like this.
Yes, you are. That is a large reason why Slack became popular in the first place. Nobody "fell for" the UX and convenience; those were solid improvements that people took to because they made things better.
I'm not going to play this game of yes you are no I'm not, but even if you're right, then that's not actually the topic of the dicussion: both I and the initial commenter was talking about how they lured people in with UX stuff or solid improvements like you said, and now pulled of this move.
