Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Windows Defender was shown to be pretty piss poor in general detections. The only thing it has going for it is its low resource footprint.


Looks like survivorship bias: malware detectable by Windows Defender does not spread so it is not included in comparisons.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: