Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A few off the top of my head:

- Not everyone wants to lock themselves into long term mortgages, renting keeps their future options open

- Getting a deposit together for some is tricky

- Risk-adverse attitudes to getting mortgages after 2008

- Outside the US and the English speaking world, renting is quite popular, perhaps the default option, e.g. continental Europe. Therefore the demand is quite high for renting and lower for buying

The real question is, why aren't banks and hedge funds moving into this area, using their clout to access cheap financing and then buying attractive properties en mass and renting them out. This would take advantage of the current low interest rate environment.



Banks are involved. In the UK most buy to let landlords use mortgages to buy properties.

- The banks earn interest on these mortgages.

- The landlords foot the first $deposit of losses on a bad choice.

- The banks don't have to pay legal fees or stamp duty during the transaction.

- The banks don't have to hire scouts to find suitable properties, or management fees to run them.

I'd say they're probably doing quite well out of it.


Indeed. If you require a mortgage for BTL, you're effectively just an agent for the bank. You take all the risk and pay the up-front costs, and the bank gets a good return for signing off a few forms.

BTL has been a good deal for the last few years, but it's getting squeezed now by tax changes. It looks like a sure thing but it really isn't, because profitability is very dependent on:

1. Tenant quality. One bad tenant can wipe out a few months of income.

2. Tax changes. The trend in the UK is clearly not in favour of landlords.

3. Interest rate changes. A good chunk of BTL property is overleveraged, and a change of a couple of percent will make it unprofitable. This seems unlikely now, but I think it's quite possible after Brexit a few years from now.

4. Legal changes, including rent controls and tenancy terms. We haven't had much of this in the UK, but it could happen with a different government.

5. Expenses. Insurance and replacement can take a gross rate of 5% down to a net rate of much less.

Some of these are UK-specific. But it seems likely that AirBnB is a better bet for property in a good location.


> The real question is, why aren't banks and hedge funds moving into this area

Yes, that was implicitly part of my question :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: