So this is not going to be a commercial Tower.app killer (sadly, they deserve it :P - data corrupting bugs aren't being fixed etc. - but I guess SourceTree being free doesn't help the market.)
Hmm... "data corrupting bugs"? Honestly, we haven't heard of a single case in all of our 5 years of being on the market (--> a Tower team member here).
Could you please get in touch with more information via support@git-tower.com ? We'd be happy to help!
Hmm I thought this would be a bigger deal on HN, especially considering how much commentary there was[1] when the limited, sign-up only pre-release version was announced.
I was hoping there would be, too, because I am clearly missing something(s) about why GitUp is so great.
Isn't combining multiple views of different interconnected bits of data the main thing that (can, if done well) make a GUI more powerful than the command line?
I only played with GitUp for a few moments, and perhaps importantly my current project is at this stage a one-man show with a basically linear set of commits to master, but I nothing jumped out at me as to why I would use this instead of SourceTree.
Is the appeal of GitUp mainly the esoteric features like "Swap with Parent (Move Down)"?
Why are so many people raving about GitUp on the interweb tubes is basically what I came here to find out (but didn't).
My 15-minute take seems to be that it has a worse UI than SourceTree for a typical (for me) git session that consists mainly of code-review-commit-repeat, but it is especially empowered for doing things like rewriting commits already committed, or "splitting commits".
https://twitter.com/GitUpApp/status/633822376568852481
The downside is that the project is now in "scratch my own itch" mode:
https://twitter.com/GitUpApp/status/633821906387406848
So this is not going to be a commercial Tower.app killer (sadly, they deserve it :P - data corrupting bugs aren't being fixed etc. - but I guess SourceTree being free doesn't help the market.)