What's the measure we're using to define quality?

I would say durability. HN is obsessed by e-waste so pointing out that something can last 7+ years wins some over. Not being sarcastic, nor am I mocking anyone, I am stating an observation.

Could you share what the config item is that you need to change for this? Or point to some docs?

I found the instructions here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/kobo/comments/1nahk6f/got_calibrewe...

Curious if you've tried either Ente or Immich? Would be interested in your take on them from your perspective

In some aspects, I'd hope that there are potential benefits on the security side of things as well. Since the host FS is generally read only in these type of distros, there is the potential to make some security teams happy.

Is this what you're referring to?

https://github.com/ducaale/xh

Seems like maybe it's written in rust? Still looks slick!

Oops my bad. Yes that's it.

Its my understanding that these good folks have moved away entirely from their hosted stuff. In the context of glos this was the "stash" feature, removed with v2 release.

More details can be found here:

https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm

See if Aqua Mail ticks the boxes you need/want. I've been a happy user for many years

Depending on your definition of "Dynamic DNS", you could check out PowerDNS.

I mean specifically in the RFC2136 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2136) sense.

It does look like PowerDNS supports it: https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/dnsupdate.html

TIL more about Dynamic DNS Update. Thanks!

Just wanting to understand the definition of Open Source you are using here, considering that you can see and download the source here:

https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad

Are you maybe referring to their Enterprise offering?

"Going forward, we will refer to the open, freely available versions as “community”. The BSL license is open, free, and source-available. However, it does not meet the definition of open source as defined by OSI" https://www.hashicorp.com/license-faq

From Open Source to Source Available https://news.itsfoss.com/open-source-source-available/

"The BSL (also sometimes abbreviated as BUSL) is considered a source-available license (..) Unlike open source licenses, the BSL prohibits the licensed code from being used in production — without explicit approval from the licensor." https://fossa.com/blog/business-source-license-requirements-...

Really appreciate the references here. I usually forgot some of the diner details on stuff like this

Publishing the source code makes it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software but that code is under the Business Source License, which is not an open source license.

(By way of example: The source code for Windows has been leaked several times, including on github, and MS made it available to various parties over the years, but I think we can agree that it is not open source.)

Thanks for the clarification!

With the marketshare that Kubernetes has, I can definitely see why so many eBPF projects focus on supporting it.

Still makes me wish more of them had support for things like HashiCop Nomad, standalone Docker/Podman, or standalone hosts.

Maybe one day! Could be really interesting to see this kind of stuff used inthe likes of homelabs or just smaller environments, or even just environments where kubernetes isn't in.