Weirdness itself is no personal virtue to be admired, there is already an epidemic of Quirk Chungus type personalities to avoid. This guy too offers an erratic yet safe gish gallop article blaming no one for the loss of our something.
Johnathan Bi explains [1] the stagnant output of deviant/contrarian creatives better as a lack of respect for artistic foundations after being influenced by the rabid 3rd or 4th generation in whatever artistic movement.
>we expect to be misled for the purpose of entertainment, and rightly decry illusion in what is presented to us as documentation
Believe in unbiased documentation at your peril. When you desire a peek behind the curtain into random people's lives you are going to get taken for a ride everytime. That makes scrolling heavy on entertainment value and all users know it.
Social media algorithm scores are just a way for us to outsource easy reputation management, that puts a lot of hops in between you and authenticity and can't really be called a "shared reality" with a straight face. Perhaps now something better can come along that doesn't favor Image marksmen.
Some users who signed up for pro ($50 p.m.) are reporting further limitations than those advertised.
>While they advertise a 1,000-request limit, the actual daily constraint is a 7.5 million-token limit. [1]
Assumes an average of 7.5k/request whereas in their marketing videos they show API requests ballooning by ~24k per request. Still lower than the API price.
Bait and switched their FAQ after the fact too. Come on Cerebras, it’s only VC money you’re burning here in the first place, let’s see some commitment to winning market share. :money: :fire:
Had a similar experience. I got rate limited as well even when I well below 1M tokens. When its working, it's nice, but can't use it as a replacement for Cursor until higher rate limits are granted.
The AI "voice-over clone" was more like default TTS David_British_1, the emotional video montage and text was what worked on people.
Ironically, the daughter's vlog [2] protesting the first fake "I'm dying" confession [1] helped the story gain traction, there was a second fake video of a random female voice claiming to be her [3] verifying the original story [1] which is probably what you saw.
The point is endless random autoplay is dupe central.
It's more that big money going towards a clear and desirable endgame is a fairly sure thing. I choose to avoid lots of tech and I won't download the app but it's very hard to see how fighting a promising open tech like LLMs is the "pro-humanity" stance here.
There's to me a sole unimpeachable use case... Two SMEs of adjacent fields can work with an LLM SME to find overlaps in research. This is a manual slog of evaluating hints at patterns and holistically trying to discover something and the LLM is only a part of it. All of the other use cases I've heard of have some kind of religious undertone or assumption and leads to people wanting to make blanket summarizing statements to avoid digging into inconvenient realities.
You mean to tell me even anti-AI people are glazing my unseen prompts now! The solve for slop is easy for teachers and communicators alike: stop asking sorry questions and you stop getting sorry responses. Or stay the easy course, you will cede the game to discreet cheaters just to make honest people jump through antiquated hoops.
Johnathan Bi explains [1] the stagnant output of deviant/contrarian creatives better as a lack of respect for artistic foundations after being influenced by the rabid 3rd or 4th generation in whatever artistic movement.
[1] https://youtu.be/YfLj1pHGfT4?t=1358