Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | twism's commentslogin

I use a bespoke hacker software keyboard (ctrl/meta/custom keys for GNU screen and emacs) and also bespoke SSH client (fork of the original irssiconnectbot) for years.

My phone is the original Pixel Fold. You would think I use it unfolded but the passport form factor lends itself to be almost as productive folded that I use it that way most of the time. Unfolded it's just a bit better experience (bigger keys / more display real estate/ more characters per line/ etc).

With that said I'm looking forward to the Click Communicator: https://clicks.tech/communicator

I've also been meaning to write about my setup and open sourcing my tools.

Oh. Writing clojure helps due to the terseness of the language. Not sure it would be a pleasant experience writing something like Java with the 80 character line limit I try to impose on myself


supply is finite


He touched on Emacs and it reminded me of the Blub Paradox https://wiki.c2.com/?BlubParadox


This. PWA is the end of 75% of apps being in the app store


Seems doubtful to me. Native apps just tend to feel better.

This scorecard says that Chrome for Android already does pretty well, but how many users use PWAs on Android?


>Seems doubtful to me. Native apps just tend to feel better.

That may have being true a few years ago, but now days unless you are really pushing for very specific stuff GPU stuff. With CSS GPU acceleration its barely noticeable for normal UIs. Now there are tons and tons of PWA that is done in a very in efficient way, then you get a really laggy app.


If the theory is that if you do everything perfectly, you can reach the performance of a mediocre native app, then obviously most PWAs are going to suck and opinions will form accordingly.


You don't have to do everything perfectly. Both web apps and "native" apps will be similarly affected by a dev who is terrible at coding. Most people use web apps every day and are not even aware that they are using web apps. Some special interest groups are just very persistent in perpetuating falsehoods and myths in this matter.


>Seems doubtful to me. Native apps just tend to feel better.

I'm really tired of hearing this quite frankly, because the reasons as to why that happens to be the case in some scenarios is not "just" a coincidence, which has been explained ad nauseam.

>This scorecard says that Chrome for Android already does pretty well, but how many users use PWAs on Android?

While I've not seen any stats, I personally use them where possible. Interestingly, my boomer Dad, who is completely clueless when it comes to technology, independently discovered them. He has no idea what a "PWA" is, but he always asks me to "make this website an app for me".


That would be the interesting thing for an EU regulation to try to cover, maybe more than the app store regs. PWAs are just websites, so Apple can't really make same security argument, right?

That would be a nicer world.


Location: Boston, MA

Remote: Yes, but onsite as well

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Clojure[Script], [Type|Java]script, Python, Kotlin, Java, Android.

Email: me@ashafa.com


All text is selectable on the app switcher granted it uses OCR so YMMV


I had no idea that was a thing, neat!


Location: Boston

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Clojure; Android, Python, GCP, Node, Typescript, JavaScript

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tashafa


Shouldn't it be an 'if' instead of 'when' in the first example?


Yes it should. Thanks for the keen eye and taking the time to point that out.


I forked Hacker's Keyboard so it would work on newer versions of Android and some other customization for GNU Screen shortcuts. That with another personally forked ConnectBot (SSH client) and I do 95% of my hobby clojure (tersness helps) programming on my pixel.


Would you be willing to share your fork?


Feed th deep research result into notebookLM and download the audio overview .. game changing


I don't use Deep Research or NotebookLM myself (or any other generative AI product). But every example of a NotebookLM audio overview I've seen was actively misleading and ignored critical context. However the voices were very personable and entertaining! Likewise Deep Research uses terrible sources and often gets things wrong, I have yet to see a single example that holds up to scrutiny...but it sure goes down smooth compared to reading a bunch of disparate papers!

I suspect Deep Research and NotebookLM aren't used to get information so much as to provide extremely low-quality infotainment. I read Wikipedia recreationally and I can definitely see the appeal of having a Wikipedia-like article/podcast for anything you can think of. But they seem miserably bad for actually learning stuff (especially the stupid podcasts).


Maybe it's an Gemini advance only feature but you can generate audio overview right there in gemini interface.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: