Since I didn't see the changes in the announcement, here is a copy pasted changelog from the NEWS file:

New in 2.14:

  * libgcrypt 1.11.
  * LVM LV integrity and cachevol support.
  * EROFS support.
  * GRUB environment block inside the Btrfs header support.
  * NX support for EFI platforms.
  * shim loader protocol support.
  * BLS and UKI support.
  * Argon2 KDF support.
  * TPM2 key protector support.
  * Appended Signature Secure Boot Support for PowerPC.
  * New option to block command line interface.
  * Support dates outside of 1901..2038 range.
  * zstdio decompression support.
  * EFI code improvements and fixes.
  * TPM driver fixes.
  * Filesystems fixes.
  * CVE and Coverity fixes.
  * Tests improvements.
  * Documentation improvements.
  * ... and tons of other fixes and cleanups...

Also passphrase retries, so you aren't immediately dumped into a grub shell if you make a typo trying to unlock your disk.

you already posted this 11 minutes prior: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46554223

> GLX is open source and still evolving

The only thing I see are some docs and a binary, no source.

There's already an apex programming language from salesforce: https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.apexcode.m...

i know i forgot :/

What did github support say?

Link to Computer History Museum blog post: https://computerhistory.org/blog/adobe-photoshop-source-code...

Link to source code: https://computerhistory.org/blogs/photoshop-software-license...

Which part of his reasoning do you find alien?

"This post is for paid subscribers"

See here instead (open article):

<https:// open.substack.com/pub/michaeljbu rry/p/foundations-...>

> stop repeating that. first, it isn't true that intelligence is barely defined. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3639

I don't think he should stop, because I think he's right. We lack a definition of intelligence that doesn't do a lot of hand waving.

You linked to a paper with 18 collective definitions, 35 psychologist definitions, and 18 ai researcher definitions of intelligence. And the conclusion of the paper was that they came up with their own definition of intelligence. That is not a definition in my book.

> second a definition is obviously not a prerequisite as evidenced by natural selection

right, we just need a universe, several billions of years and sprinkle some evolution and we'll also get intelligence, maybe.

cool, you can move goalposts and claim no true scotsman would define intelligence that way; in addition you are confusing sufficient and necessary.