Wow, 512GB of storage on the base model! That means the more reasonable 1TB option is cheaper now (+$200 over base).

The M4 MacBook Air (16gb, 1TB) retailed for $1400 (https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1884084-REG/apple_mba...).

The M5 equivalent is now $1300. 1TB requires the CPU upgrade.

Yes, previously the 512GB Air was $1200, now it's $1100.

LSPs suck. Compilers should be able to re-use their cache for queries, interfaced with through a simple CLI.

They should not need more RAM than what the compiler uses.

Most LSPs don't work well for big projects or with non-standard setups like Bazel.

Edit: is this really so controversial it has to be downvoted?

But now your asking the compiler to also be a daemon. The compiler devs to add and maintain a not insignificant feature. The compiler to keep everything it caches for queries (whoops, look at that RAM usage climb!), and to cache data suitable for answering LSP queries (gosh! It's climbing a lot!)

Why does it need to be a daemon? Why isn't the on-disk cache enough? Running a compiler without making changes is instant. Many operations of LSPs feel slower than compiler's incremental compilation.

What cache is needed that the compiler doesn't already have?

One of the many advantages of LSPs is that they can continue to work even under the condition of compilation error.

This is not unique to LSPs, a good compiler will do the same.

Compilers only do one file at a time, but an LSP needs to parse all the files.

Also, an LSP needs to update incrementally when you edit the file, not just when you compile.

And not every language is compiled. And not everything that has an LSP is even a language. I don't think the gp comment was very thought through.

It's sad to see that the sane opinion is so heavily downvoted.

LSP as a protocol is fine, but the actual technical implementation of JSON RPC is braindead. Only web devs that don't know anything about native code could devise such an abomination. What happened to plugins and dll's?

> They do inference at a loss

They don't, inference is cheap, especially for agents because of cache hits. The API prices are just inflated.

Didn't the safety-conscious employees already leave when OpenAI fired Sam Altman and then re-hired him?

In my mind the only people left are those who are there for the stocks.

In all seriousness, what’s the average tenure at OpenAI and how much of the company in March 2026 was even around for that?

It's comforting to know that some of the brightest minds of our generation are going to work at OpenAI, then quitting a few months later horrified, only to post a short mysterious tweet warning everyone of the dangers ahead. So much for alignment and serving humanity.

And they will continue to work for Google / Meta et al to use novel AI techniques to sell us more and better ads, only to quit a few years later to do more soul searching where everything went wrong /s

Review the signers https://notdivided.org

They've been deleted. For obvious reasons. You want to take a stand but you don't want to stop working for the people who do the things you don't want to do. It's all so very american. I'll put my name on but if it doesn't work remove my name so I don't get into trouble ok? Home of the brave.

What are you on about? The names are still there.

And h1 slaves

I'm guessing at least 50% of the "users" of Antigravity are actually OpenCode users exploiting the oauth and endpoint. Must be infuriating to them if they're subsidizing it.

The OpenCode plugin (8.7k stars btw!) even advertises "Multi-account support — add multiple Google accounts, auto-rotates when rate-limited"[1]

[1] https://github.com/NoeFabris/opencode-antigravity-auth/blob/...

Looks like someone gave their OpenClaw a link to this thread.

I have the same feeling.

The disgusting, gross lewdness of a naked body. Thank God someone did something.

A peer message quoted the PDF of the things he did, before finally getting put on a registry. It wasn't just being naked in his home to say the least. The message was auto-flagged because of its content.

An employee told him they need to rename ASAP or lawyers will get involved. Is that much different from a C&D? Even if he received a formal C&D, he could have done the exact same thing (rename) and be fine.

Well done, you managed to tie Rust, Nix, Haskell and OCaml to "extremely complex, wasteful, and unusable"