When has the US govt and its allies been secretive about spying on non-citizens? We literally have agreements with European allies to collaborate on it.
The sticking point seems to be that Anthropic didn't want to help the Trump regime spying on its own citizens (by using Claude to sift through mass-surveillance data)
I think it'd be surprising if money is the limiting factor in Gemini's success considering Google has very deep pockets, so that's probably not true.
Also, Gemini with DoD money and DoD direction is likely to result in an AI that works very well for the DoD but significantly less well for other things, especially if your use case benefits from some guardrails (and most use cases do, because you rarely want AI to just do whatever it fancies.)
Gemini is just the worst of the 3 horses. The gov will eventually make them all to bend the knee. PRISM already showed they(eventually) all comply. I personally see this more like PR for Anthropic before the IPO
Besides being a bad joke, this is in terrible taste on a thread read by people with Alzheimer's patients in their lives, and it violates HN's rules that discussion should be valuable and inspire curiosity.
These particular examples are figures of speech, so "shut" in "shut up" still means the same thing it would mean in "shut the door." And "up" is used the same way as "cover up."
So the issue is just that this is figurative language, and you have to know that a kickoff is the beginning of certain sports, for example. It's more of a cultural issue than something a dictionary needs to fix.
In the US, if you ordered a hot dog and got a sausage (or vice versa), it would be very reasonable to return the item and ask for something else. They are culturally completely different, the same way Cheerios in milk is not another cold soup like gazpacho is.
These traits (violence and low IQ) are both caused by exposure to lead. This study is only novel and interesting if they controlled for that (at least using age).
In 3.4a they say the groups show "Absence of differences between groups in potential confounding variables (e.g., number of participants per group, socioeconomic level, educational level, among others)." Intragroup ages are provided in Table 2.
I do not know why you were voted down, I have seen a few articles stating the same. It showed violent crime has decreased and the main correlation was the reduction of lead in the air.
In 1975 lead was eliminated from auto fuels in the US. As lead in the atmosphere decreased so did violent crime. Crime stats were from the FBI. They noticed also the IQ increased as time went on too.
So like you, I think they need a better control group. Maybe based upon year born and lead levels as the child grows to adulthood ?
Uh... good? He used his money and influence for an attempted coup and then an attack on the capitol building that resulted in multiple deaths and hundreds of convictions for things like sedition.
If a private business can't choose to stop aiding literal treason, none of us have any freedom of association at all.
Republicans have been the ones arguing that businesses don't have to do business with anyone for any reason. Are you saying they don't believe that standard should apply to Trump? If so, that sounds like hypocrisy to me.
I think this is an OK standard for small privately owned businesses... like a bakery, a mechanics shop, etc. Obviously the rules would be different for services that are required and necessary. Ie. a telephone company, national ISP's, hospitals, banks, etc. Especially banks that received government bail-out funds. So, it's different to me.
Conservatives have argued that healthcare providers shouldn't have to provide healthcare to people with whom they differ ideologically. I say they should be careful what the wish for.
Not quite. Conservatives argue they shouldn’t have to provide medical practices like abortion that violate their personal ideologies. They don’t selectively grant them for a subset of the population.
reply