- I have completed about ~150 programming gigs on fiverr as a seller. Most of them are small tasks related to python/ google app scripts.
- My average selling price is ~50$. Buyers on fiverr are moslty looking for short-term projects or get some very specific things done.
- It highly competitive, especially if you are just getting started. Building a reputation through reviews is very important for potential buyers to find you.
- Best advice would be to get around 10 reviews by pricing the service around $5-$25(easy to get gigs in the range). Once you have some good reviews, you will rank better in their search and have the leverage to charge buyers more.
- Nice thing about fiverr is you don't have to bid for work as a seller. Potential buyers will contact you if they find out what you offer through your gig description.
Experience so far has been good- buyers are straightforward and happy if you give them quality service.
There is a lot of details missing in the write up like what exactly lead to the ordeal with freelancer.com customer service agent and subsequent account limitation.
The usual process is quite seamless - you bid, get the contract, you get paid few days after you deliver the job .
I also had a bad experience with the cs executive of a similar freelance site before. Most of them are quite insensitive and do exactly what they are said to do without even trying to understand the context of the issue.
I believe this is such a case. It would have made much sense if the author could have explained the issue in detail so that readers can decide for themselves who is wrong here.
iPhone X has not been authorized as required by the rules of the Federal Communications Commission. This device is not, and may not be, offered for sale or lease, or sold or leased, until authorization is obtained.
What does this in disclaimer section means?
It means that they purposefully did not file with the FCC before presenting this so they would minimize leak opportunities, and did not care as their timeline is sufficiently padded forward that they will do that this month; but they also can't pretend it is already sellable: the FCC technically could say "no" (though it doesn't seem sufficiently crazy different from the iPhone 8 that I would imagine anyone expects any chance of that happening).
Probably hasn't certified by FCC yet [1], for sale. The FCC process has been subject to leaks in the past, so they've probably waited until after main announcement.
they are promoting it before pasing through FCC certification, maybe they wanted to keep it secret since FCC data is publicly available and that would basically reveal their design and specs
Basically means that Apple had a hard time getting the final specs worked out so they didn't submit it to the FCC for review until it was too late to have approval ready to go for the announcement.
