Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more popalchemist's commentslogin


Wu wei.


Gamification actually can help create habits. Seems odd to not leverage that.


It is, though. The premises of white nationalism, like any form of fascism, require an "out-group," and at the same time a mechanism for convincing the "in-group" that hating them is morally acceptable. The framing of empathy as a vice does that job. It is literally part of their stochastic terrorism strategy. That's why they're so "anti-woke", despite not ever (literally not once) defining what "woke" is. They don't care what it is, or what their constituents think it means. They only care that there is buy-in on the idea that caring for others and being sensitive to their needs is bad. Because that is the prerequisite of the rest of their plans.


This looks really well done. The software is both well-designed (from UX / UI pov) AND it's OSS AND it's just an SSD / NAS underneath it all, I think this kind of thing is a welcome addition to the market.


The entire UI seems lifted from icloud and osx. I can't even tell the difference


Personally I'm cool with that. Originality is overrated. Do whatever works.


LOVE this. Are there any plans to open-source? I'd love to run my own instance.

Also some feedback: the ordering buttons are inexplicably in french despite everything else being in English. Choice of language or defaulting to English would be expected...

Also - multi-select and nullable options. So that I can create options like Taco / Steak / Pasta, and add side options that are relevant only when one of those is selected.


If there's a demand for it to become open-source, why not? But I'll have to improve code quality first. As the presence of french labels indicates it, i18n is not properly implemented for this project.


No, you really don't have to. Partially complete software can have a lot of value too.

Anyone can fork it and quickly add the i18n (or just translate into a different language) for their own purposes. People will likely want to contribute i18n. People may fix or improve things for you.

Of course, it's entirely up to you - but I've appreciated half-complete software countless times before.


> But I'll have to improve code quality first.

Don't fall into this trap, strike while the HN iron is hot, all these people +1'ing will never come back when you're eventually happy the code quality is "improved"

If it's truly that bad you'll benefit from the feedback since it's an internet exposed service, although considering you're a professional freelancer, I'm sure it's fine.


It is far from fine. It was my little dirty project where I knew there was only 3 users and where I could be finally escape the usual process from my professional life.

But heh, now is the Time for me to patch all the hole I left. Lots of coffees depend on me now.


Si c'est open source je peux aider avec les traductions !

And yes, I feel like, working on it before open sourcing it is like cleaning before the cleaner. It's ok if the code is messy and there are bugs, that's why OS exist.

Very cool idea imo congrats


*source ouverte?


ahah le cloud infonuagique en source ouverte


There's demand for it, add me to the list who wants this and would use it


I'm definitely interested! My family would love this.


Me too


+1 interest!


+1!


Me too


It's open-source now : https://github.com/Karalix/micro-cafe

have fun :)


Any plans to open source?

PLUS, to sweeten the deal. here’s a bunch of tech support!


Wrong, buddy.

Many of the top AI services use human feedback to continuously apply "reinforcement learning" after the initial deployment of a pre-trained model.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinforcement_learning_from_hu...


RLHF is a training step.

Inference (what happens when you use an LLM as a customer) is separate from training.

Inference and training are separate processes. Using an LLM doesn’t train it. That’s not what RLHF means.


I am aware, I've trained my own models. You're being obtuse.

The big companies - take Midjourney, or OpenAI, for example - take the feedback that is generated by users, and then apply it as part of the RLHF pass on the next model release, which happens every few months. That's why they have the terms in their TOS that allow them to do that.


The critiques about local inference are valid, if you're billing this as an open source alternative to existing cloud based solutions.


Thanks for the feedback, probably should have been clearer in my original post and in the README as well. Local inference is already supported via Pipecat, you can use ollama or any custom OpenAI endpoint. Local STT is also supported via whisper, which pipecat will download and manage for you.


Rad. put that front and center on the readme.


Updated!


They do miss the forest for the trees, but their observations about the trees are not wrong. The debate over who gets warner bros is all about who gets to dismember it for streaming content, not the continuation of theatrical distribution.


Grammar abortion. The age of the average founder rises. The average founder doesn't age at a rate less than 1 year per year.


No "average founder" exists, but the mathematical average of founder ages does!


Please just let me believe I can double my lifespan as percieved by the rest of the world by becoming the average founder.


However, an additive 6 months is definitely what some have done (1yr + 6mo). Stress is a killer.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: