Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pif's commentslogin

> if it fails, it is only considered evidence that you were not doing it enough.

20 years ago, this was the meme about XML.

More seriously, this was also the answer about Communism.


> "We will do x and y as a compromise but not z"

This reminds a lot of this: "I'm going to try this extremely difficult pastry recipe at home, but I'll use margarin insted of butter because <idiot reason> and a teasponn of stevia instead of the prescribed 200 g of sugar for <another idiot reason>."


Wake me up when a heavily industrialized country will be in the list, thanks!

That is an good next step, but also kind-of moving the goal posts.

Albania is fairly industrialized though I'd say: ~20% of GDP as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albania?useskin=vector#Economy vs 15% of US economy as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_in_the_United_St...


Hello, could you please elaborate about those laws?


The Jones Act requires that all goods transported by water between US ports be carried on ships that were built in the US, fly the US flag, and crewed by US citizens. That effectively makes it impossible to ship oil between US states at scale without a direct pipeline.

Though to be clear I believe we would still be a net exporter without the Jones Act, it's just one of those weird things about the US oil industry.


> you now can annihilate them [...] from a comfortable distance

The problem is: they can, too.


Muons are not stable, thus you cannot tear them off matter as you'd do with electrons. And they have a mass of 105 MeV each, which means you need a nice particle accelerator to create a few of them.

Furthermore, if you want (most of) them to fly in a particular direction, you need to scale that accelerator up.


In civilised places, the government is the people. And civilised people know they are the government.


Like which places are those?

This is some idealist fairytale view that people like to believe in but doesn't actually exist.


This is unnecessarily confrontational. The real point here is that there better functioning democracies than the US. They have faults, but Scandinavia and much of northern Europe (partially excluding the UK) much better approximates what you call a fairytale than a US perspective might allow you to believe. Trust in and satisfaction with government institutions in Scandinavia and Finland are much, much higher than in the US, and it's largely justified by their competence and delivery of public goods.


>This is unnecessarily confrontational.

Why?

>but Scandinavia and much of northern Europe

That's like 3-5 out of 195 countries and only 0,3%-0,5% of the world's population. Being born there is like winning the lottery so maybe take that into consideration when arguing with such examples since that's not the norm. Like what are the odds that people you talk to online are part of that 0,5%? So who's the one being needlessly confrontational?

>Trust in and satisfaction with government institutions in Scandinavia and Finland are much, much higher than in the US

I don't care about the situation in the US since I don't live there. I'm talking from the perspective in Europe(not Scandinavia) where I can't say the democracy is representing or serving me. No law maker asked about the major decisions the EU made.


> I'm talking from the perspective in Europe > > No law maker asked about the major decisions the EU made.

Idiot brexiteer talk...


Did your mom teach you to talk like that?


She taught me to only speak the truth.


The important question is: which fraction of people can afford it in either country?


No, this is just what pays big dividends to useless managers.


> No one can predict anything.

Nobody ever could. Accept this reality and everything will be fine.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: