Not sure where you've got the 'few dozen' number from - that's not to my experience. Tandberg quote "1,000,000 passes on any area of tape, equates to over 20,000 end to end passes/260 full tape backup" http://www.tandbergdata.com/default/assets/File/Data_Sheets/...
Atleast from what I've been told and from experience, if you rotate over master backup tapes every few months, the tape will be almost 6 years old by the time it reaches the first two dozen end to end writes, that usually means newer LTO standards, newer drives and newer tapes on the market to replace them with.
> 1,000,000 passes on any area of tape, equates to over 20,000 end to end passes
What in the world does that first number mean?
My best guess is that it's some nonsense math based on the fact that the tape head contacts 32 tracks at once. So writing a full tape is 1 "full pass", which equals 208 "end to end passes" as the tape feeds back and forth, which equals 6656 """passes on any area""".
Depending on where you draw the line on "privacy", Matomo can also be hosted by you, if you don't mind the extra burden, and one installation can track multiple sites.
Edit: Not advocating in favour of Matomo, it's just that it is a solution which seems quite full featured. Personally I found it painful enough to work with it (from a devops perspective) that I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot stick.
We do have an instance of Matomo installed for testing, but it still feels like just a self-hosted version of Google Analytics.
Way too many features that a person with a blog won’t need. Something simpler like Fathom or this one, which was built with privacy in mind from the get-go — instead of just “I want to get away from Google” —, seems like a better solution.
To be clear, I am not saying Matomo is a bad piece of software. Just that it does not feet our needs.
Slirp was the equivalent of a userland, and user accessible version of SLIP. It allowed end users, to have IP equivalent connectivity if they had a shell account.
This was in the days when people had dial-in accounts to a shell, and wanted to use Mosaic web browser on their machines.
Under 'about', the rationale for STARTTLS is listed, which includes, but isn't exclusive to the HSTS like list:
- Increase STARTTLS adoption
- Increase the number of mailservers that actually validate certificates
- Maintain a STARTTLS Policy List to help prevent downgrade attacks on email services.