Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nutjob2's commentslogin

Alcohol is the deadliest and has the biggest social costs of any drug. Nicotine is second, heroin is a distant third.

Drugs that are largely harmless, like MDMA, are illegal with heavy penalties.

Drug policy is largely nonsense and rampantly hypocritical.


MDMA is a lot more acutely dangerous than nicotine, and somewhat moreso than alcohol. If you drink too much, you'll vomit, and for the most part be fine. Obviously that not always true (I'm sure everyone knows at least one person who had to have their stomach pumped in college), but for the vast majority of users, their body's natural defense against being poisoned works fine.

An MDMA overdose, however, needs active, external cooling to ride out. We don't really have a natural safety valve for overconsumption.

That's not to say it should remain banned (I'm quite pro-legalization myself), but it's not entirely arbitrary to have MDMA banned versus other, less acutely dangerous drugs. Better examples of unjustifiably banned drugs are psychedelics such as LSD.


See the problems with the Australian system, which is basically what you describe.

This is nonsense. There is a logic to the law, it's not arbitrary.

I could argue (unsuccessfully) that it's discriminatory and unfair that I have to wait an extra 3 years to claim my pension compared to older people.


This is just whataboutism, but the UK also regulates sugar in fairly draconian ways too, for example.

There are good reasons to target smoking given how addictive and deadly it is. Nicotine is fairly unique in this regard.


It's reductio ad absurdum. Obesity is really bad for you and strains public health services. Should the government enforce a cap on caloric intake?

They already prevent advertising the sorts of foods that contribute to obesity to children, and encourage you to drink less sugary drinks by applying tax to them (though unfortunately manufacturers have responded to this by reducing choice and adding artificial sweeteners instead of selling something at a higher price that can be enjoyed once every few weeks.

I don't think any of this is unreasonable in a country that picks up the tab through both subsidised dental care and completely free-at-point-of-use healthcare.


You mean the point is to dump it all on the end user's machine, hogging its resources.

It's bad enough having to run one boated browser, now we have to run multiples?

This is not the right path.


I guess you'll change your tune the first time they force you to submit to an inspection of your vagina.

> "Well, yeah, if you do something egregious...", nope.

Leaving a bad review online for a local business can get you arrested and jailed.



No, because defamation is a civil matter, so you can't be arrested or end up in jail.

These ME countries are authoritarian hellholes with a thin veneer of civility and modernity. Think I'm exaggerating? How about being randomly dragged off your flight to have your vagina inspected: https://www.arabnews.jp/en/middle-east/article_30004/

Being thrown in jail arbitrarily without much recourse is such a common occurrence it's spawned its won business category: https://www.detainedindubai.org/

I personally would not step foot in any of these places. This article is not news, it's par for the course.


Very racist comment. They’re not all the same and this article is about Dubai, not Qatar.

The UAE is the most open country in the ME and even allows gay people which is not legal in Qatar


You may not be interested in AI, but AI is interested in you.

I use that phrase with "done with Microsoft," but it fits well here too!

I've had emails from Google end up in spam and I'm using Google Workspace, it's driven by what people flag as spam, not domain trust.

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: