Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | notaigenerated's commentslogin

The summaries are great. What model/process do you use to generate them?

Is it all automated?


I use OpenAI GPT-4o mini and have automated everything since for this amount of articles it would be overwhelming to do it manually. AND i wanted the translations so imagine every article is present in 6 languages. That has to be automated.


Your brain isn't broken. You're just a man.


Telegram is barely russian. The founder is basically a russian dissident and a French citizen.


Totally makes sense, since Kaspersky is not just an anti-virus company and it's not just "part-Russian"

They're literally a contractor and consultant to russian military.

https://informnapalm.org/en/alabugaleaks-part-2-kaspersky-la...


So, like Symantec?


Do you have sources of Symantec working for russian military?


You probably think intentionally missing the analogy is clever.


It would be an analogy if US currently was in the middle of exterminating a nation.


The author sounds as if he was directly hired by the russians, lmao.

His writing tone is "60s soviet propaganda" and the arguments are shallow and insubstantial, to say the least.

upd. Just checked his other articles. Yup, dude is a russian shill.


I’m not familiar with the author or their other articles so I can’t say whether they are or not but do we need to label all critics of western foreign policy Russian/CCP shills?


I often do the "background check" of the writers that smell propaganda/psyop. What did they write and when they wrote it.

If you do just a quick check of what this guy wrote, you'll see he isn't just "a critic".

His Ukraine-related articles are the real litmus test. He's literally spewing the russian propaganda nonsense.


I had a look, maybe, to me he just looks like bog-standard D.C libertarian think-tank type of guy. The Cato institute positions itself as libertarian non-interventionist (founded by American libertarians and a billionaire), so it would be consistent with their viewpoint. To me it seems more likely the shilling going on here is domestic rather than foreign.


He seems to have been sacked by Cato for his Ukraine views https://twitter.com/AltAltLeft/status/1646505224457138176


Also, in Europe, it isn't a secret that Putin's violence in Syria was meant to create pressure on Europe and create a diversion from Ukraine, and it worked (wir schaffen das).

When I read the title, I had a feeling somebody wanted to reframe that.


This is why the author should have written the article during Obama's term, not now. Now Russia is responsible for pressuring the EU with migrants. However, not a word about it, which makes it anti-US propaganda.


And yet he's telling the truth.

US commercial and military interests led to the destabilisation of many republics and states across the world in the name of freedom and democracy. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the bold and sad truth and the truth is that those wonderful values have been completely emptied from their meaning by the US capitalist elites.


"Come and see" and "20 Days in Mariupol". Both are about wars and both affect you the way nothing else does.

The last one is a documentary about the war in Ukraine. The actual raw uninterpreted reality of things that we read about in history books or in the news changes your perspective on many things, from politics to simple things in life that we often take for granted.

News stories force an agenda on you. History books may give you some knowledge about the reality we live in today. THIS lets you live through the traumatic experience of the history books and news story events.


I was nearly catatonic after I left a screening of "Come and See", I have never seen such a raw and unflinching story told about the war, nothing held back. Just indescribable the mood that it sets and how it unfolds the story. Hard to even put down in words my feelings on it.


> News stories force an agenda on you.

This "documentary" does the same - force the agenda - perhaps even more so.

History books can potentially teach how to avoid this kind of conflicts. They are not emotionally appealing - unlike "documentaries", and likely less interesting, but we need to read one to avoid making another



Not everything should be a chat interface.


Banks did that to our money and everyone's fine with that. Although banks are slow and stupid af, unlike big tech who offer high quality services.


Banks had hundrets of years to become "slow and stupid af". Seems like big tech needs less then a decade for that.


Openai changed it course.

Time for rebranding!

ClosedAI? MicrosoftAI? What do you think it should be?


Microsoft Subsystem for AI.


Microsoft Subsystem for Automatic Interpolation.


I actually think that open source AI will be a terrible idea for sufficiently advance AI for the same reasons that open source nukes or bioweapons would be a mistake. So I'd be very happy to see them change their name to ClosedAI.


That may well be but a single for profit company like Microsoft will be a terrible guardian of that.

Future OpenAI usage limitations:

- anything illegal in the US and your country

- anything MS deems immoral and ethically problematic

- and anything that competes with Microsoft.


Why is that?


They should go old school and call it Clippy. That would be amazing.


I already know many people who are calling it "Clippy", seems to be the unofficial name for it within circles I frequent ha


command.com


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: