Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | notachatbot123's commentslogin

The original question is:

> What happens when you have a codebase made with claude using this setup and claude is down for let's say 8 hours?

So: - A codebase made with Claude - Using this [Claude] setup - Claude is down


What does it matter what the codebase is made with? If Claude is down, use Codex, or Gemini, or Deepseek. That version of the argument is just way too easy to counter.


Anna's Archived themselves scraped together all this data from other sources. See the notes of origin for example, often they are from zlib or libgen et ceteta.


https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-business-model/ lists

- Partner deals with search engines - Partner deals with bookmark partners - Partner deals through Direct Match - https://vivaldi.com/blog/privacy-without-compromise-proton-v...

How are integrated ads and dispatch of user data to third-parties sustainable sources of income?


Sustainable means those sources of income will continue, not that they are positive for users.


Even more worrying are the implications for fakenews, propaganda, fraud, deception and mental health.


This is really my biggest worry when it gets to consumer AI. People already have a hard time informing themselves properly. Now we have technology that just boosts the already existing confirmation bias people have. It's sickening.


Maybe short term yes. But longer term people will finally put their guard up against deception that’s been around for decades.


That's not how the human mind works. People still get skewed views on body standards even when they know that what they are looking at is biased and/or photoshopped, for example. When an AI fake stirs emotions just right, half the people will not even care about the truth.


At that point their ground truth is completely skewed (already for some folk), everything is relative. Some of them will probably die off in self-induced Darwin award winning ways, but sadly certain skewed world views may persist.


No, it will just become like in the Soviet system - people will not believe anything anymore, and become disillusioned and just not care about anything other than their immediate surroundings. That's what being innundated with fake/exaggerated information results in. People don't know what to believe because they're seeing/hearing everything, and bits will be retained, but in general there will be a "this is too much, I can't keep up, who even knows, shrug".


If they haven’t in the past I don’t see why they would now.


Next generation is healing already and staying away from social media, etc.


My generation will be the new fox news boomers, but instead of Fox news it will be ChatGPT and Claude telling them that Israel is the greatest country in the world and if you disagree you must be an antisemite.


Maybe thats just your bubble. People I know are back to books and encyclopedias.


Counter-point, real incriminating videos will be easy to dismiss.

"No that's not me, that's AI"


People will still believe what they want to believe.


I wonder what makes you belittle the altitude dimension? Buildings have storys, humans can sit and stand, birds can fly, your eyes can move up and down your monitor.


Also the altitude of a given lat/long can change due to geological processes, climate processes, war, etc.


The history and geography change very little whether the bird was flying while I was sitting and looking above the monitor. This is what I meant with "meaningful way". Even though a building has storys, life on 12th floor isn't much different from life on second floor. In any case, much less different than life 20 years ago, or ten kilometers away from it. In a sci-fi story or movie we see lives really in 3D, planets wrapped in habitations and such. THERE you can and should count altitude as meaningful, but we're not really there yet.


And the planet is dying


The planet cannot die since it doesn't live. Planet life isn't dying either.


Yes, but it has some extra 5 billion years to live.


That’s a misconception. The Sun is slowly growing more luminous, and inescapable global warming is expected to make the Earth uninhabitable in about a billion years.

Life on Earth is about 3/4 of the way through its existence…


Strong AI smell, lots of mixed signals in the project's purported goals, half the site is broken if you click on links. I remember Midori as a light-weight open-source browser. Is this a scam?


I was wondering the same. I definitely recognize the name but not from a Firefox fork, which this seems to be? Before it was a lightweight webkit browser. The original website[1][2] also doesn't work anymore and the wikipedia entry [3] still assumes it's a webkit browser.

No idea what's going on.

[1] https://www.midori-browser.org

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20200630051854/https://www.midor...

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midori_(web_browser)


It transformed. Same name, different browser.


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Midori_%28web_bro...

> programming language = originally in [[C (programming language)|C]] & GTK2, rewritten completely in [[Vala (programming language)|Vala]] & GTK3<ref>{{cite web

Very different browser.


I'm intrigued by the repeated sentences - doesn't feel like a mistake an LLM would make, but also doesn't feel like a mistake a human would make so many times in a single article.


> doesn't feel like a mistake an LLM would make

I had AI misspell a (well-known) name on a query I made. I had misspelled it and a bunch of other things while typing in a hurry one day. I asked it why and (after "apologizing", sidestepping, etc..) it said it was trying to match my communications style.

There are a whole bunch of reasons why that's bad, including supporting any misinformed views I might have on a topic just because it's trying to "connect" with me.

It has also mimicked any frustration I might have with it (curse, exclamations) when it has wasted my time with bogus facts and sources that don't support the claims it has made. So if I occasionally use colorful language, it would respond the same way.

I stop that behavior as soon as I see it. It just leads to a terrible chat (query) session.


Humankind should depopulate, we cannot sustain infinite growth and are already destroying our planet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation


There’s more forested land in Europe today than there has been since the middle ages


Almost half of which is monocultural plantations and not actual _forests_.

That’s about as ecologically true as calling a bunch of crop fields grasslands.


I wouldn't focus on the Europe's forests though.

The biodiversity and nature loss around the world are staggering, and the meagre gains on one tiny continent don't offset that.


More tree plantations.


Citation needed.

Also, even if true, a lot is likely due to people leaving the countryside and migrating to the cities during the latter half of the 20th century. To feed these urban populations, an enormous amount of food needs to be imported from other countries. So really the deforestation has been exported, same as pollution from manufacturing.


You don't need citation for common knowledge.


If OP had said "in last 40 years" then yeah sure.

But since the middle ages, or 500 years ago, how is that common knowledge?


> Fri 3 Oct 2025 // 09:06 UTC


There is zero history of her programming. This is a scam, using her name.


The Wikipedia article about her https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milla_Jovovich links to https://www.millaj.com/ which links to her Instagram http://instagram.com/millajovovich/ where the bio reads:

> Mother/Actress/Architect of MemPalace free and open source on GitHub

And the linktree from the Instagram profile links to https://github.com/milla-jovovich/mempalace


The parent post didn't say "unauthorized." Plenty of scams use celebrities' names/reputations and compensate then for it. See: just about every pump-and-dump cryptocoin.


WHAT?!?!? Surely you aren't telling me that the Hawk Tuah girl didn't create her own coin from scratch.


This is what you get combining shameless bunch of famous B-rated movie star, crypto dudes and Automatic programming hype (Claude in contibs)

https://github.com/milla-jovovich/mempalace/graphs/contribut...

But it is so dumb that it doesn't even add to the drift towards greater Idiocracy clock values.


That is a very valid concern, but in this case she is actually "involved":

https://xcancel.com/BrianRoemmele/status/2041397710113435659...


And her last posts before these were shilling NFTs in 2022.


I remember when Paris Hilton was shilling NFTs.


I’ve watched Milla on social media discussing this project, she is working with a developer who is a friend of hers to have it go forward.


her partner "engineered" it while she "architected", whatever that means in this particular case


It means she came up with the idea and partnered with someone to build the code. Pretty simple to understand.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: