Make me transparent aluminum!

So many unsubstantiated claims, you find this pattern in someone infected with exceptionalism.

Ok, show me apes who unambiguously ask abstract questions.

The Neanderthal claim is what you can call unsubstantiated (so, one claim, not so many), but I would like to draw your attention to the extreme stability of the Mousterien industry. No Homo sapiens sapiens industry comes close to this level of stability.

"infected with exceptionalism"

So, we aren't exceptional at all? How do you square this rejection with the fact that you have never encountered, say, a written comment by a member of another species?

The word "infected" is very negative. I like intelligent animals, but no one except for us has, for example, as versatile hands as we do.

You mean greet each other like a chimp and a baboon.

We must have very different workflows, I am curious about yours. What tools are you using and how are you guiding Qwen3-Coder? When I am using Claude Code, it often works for 10+ minutes at a time, so I am not aware of inference speed.

You must write very elaborate prompts for 10 minutes to be worth the wait. What permissions are you giving it and how much do you care about the generated code? How much time did you spend on initial setup?

I‘ve found that the best way for myself to do LLM assisted coding at this point in time is in a somewhat tight feedback loop. I find myself wanting to refine the code and architectural approaches a fair amount as I see them coming in and latency matters a lot to me here.

> When I am using Claude Code, it often works for 10+ minutes at a time, so I am not aware of inference speed.

Indirectly, it sounds like you're aware about the inference speed? Imagine if it took 2 minutes instead of 10 minutes, that's what the parent means.

2 minutes is the worst delay. With 10 minutes, I can and do context switch to something else and use the time productively. With 2 min, I wait and get frustrated and bored.

Context switching makes you less productive compared to if you could completely finish one task before moving to the other though. in the limit an LLM that responds instantly is still better.

FWIW, I was not confused and don't believe you need to clarify.

It was never about being confused.

We have to hold comedians to highest possible journalistic standard while allowing Fox News to be entertainment. This country runs on double standards.

And? He is comedian that runs a late night show.

Why do we hold women and comedians to some sort of high standard but there is a whole montage of right wing grifters actively calling for liberal lives?

And it wasn't even a joke, it was a statement about what was going on. It isn't even about what he said, or even Kimmel. Unless he wasn't slathering all over the fake mythos of white washing this Kimmels racist, bigoted hateful grift, the right was going to go after him for literally anything.

Kimmel's crime is laughing at Trump and pointing out his brain dead hypocrisy.

This is it, the whole thing. https://youtu.be/U6NJJ0FcvYY?t=252

Carr needs to leave. It isn't his job to police the political airwaves.

How about Cloudflare stops penalizing non-chrome browsers with elevated rates of bot checks and captchas?

They don’t penalize browsers for not being Chrome – Safari users almost never see those, because their devices support a protocol for attesting real hardware with a real user, in what is hopefully a privacy-preserving manner:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/eliminating-captchas-on-iphones-...

That’s the underlying problem here: web sites are constantly getting suspicious traffic and if you do something like using Tor or a “free” VPN, the owners of those sites are probably going to ask companies like Cloudflare to validate or block you rather than try to tell whether you’re a bot.

Anyone concerned with privacy really needs to be focused on that problem because most site owners care more about not going broke than supporting browsers or privacy tools which few of their customers use. It’s destroying the open web.

So you are saying they don't penalize browser from not being Chrome and then link to a specific mechanism that they are allow listing Safari. That goes directly counter to what you are claiming.

I have seen it myself, from my own system. Firefox, almost impossible to use the web due to non-stop bot checks by CF. For the same session, same site(s), I give up and use Chrome, with all the same browser extensions, and I sail right in. Multiple times.

Suspicious traffic is using Firefox, because Chrome browsers are 90%+ of the traffic. And the rich mac users have a special mechanism for bypassing them as your article outlines.

Using Firefox is the internet equivalent of DWB.

> Firefox, almost impossible to use the web due to non-stop bot checks by CF. For the same session, same site(s), I give up and use Chrome, with all the same browser extensions, and I sail right in.

This is very much not my experience. I don't know if you use a VPN or have a ton of extensions but if I was hitting that so hard I'd consider trying a clean profile with no extensions and adding things back in to see if you can find the trigger condition.

Firefox on macOS is fine. I've been using it as my primary browser for years. I consistently get captchas on archive.is (and just verified I also do on Brave), but rarely see it elsewhere.

I don't know the cause of what you're seeing, but it's not simply Firefox.

I get them with Firefox on FreeBSD. Chromium on FreeBSD less so.

Firefox on Ubuntu here. I switched over the past couple of months from using Chrome on Windows.

I see exactly the same amount of security checks, as far as I can tell.

Cruel joke!