I’ve never seen any CSS function that has this call back style where you get parameters that you can modify. So interesting! Are there any other examples of this or is this unique to lch?
I actually strongly believe the universe has an effectively infinite carrying capacity for software. This is because all systems can be improved upon recursively
As we are able to automate more and more of the creation process, we may be able to create an infinite amount of software. However, what sustains high wages for our industry is a constrained supply of people with an ability to create good software.
it could be related to the fact that there's more people leaving in cities, not that many cities, and those cities have data centers close-by. bigger concentration of population near data centers should go a long way.
Yeah, that stat is based on performance tested by speed.cloudflare.com, so it's actually a mix of overall capability and local speed to Cloudflare data centers. It may also be skewed by relative unpopularity of Cloudflare's speed test site compared to more well known alternatives.
Their speed test service isn't very accurate either, its always over reporting by a factor of 100Mbit/s for me (vnstat running at the time of the test shows this). The JavaScript tests in general are not very useful IMO.
The continent graphs are actually based on measurements towards a set of providers, only one of which is Cloudflare. This is mentioned in the blog post.
Yeah, the IQI measurements are aggregated, but much lower than the continent map, which is only to Cloudflare. So the high bandwidth figure noted by parent is only for Cloudflare.
The map shows numbers from speed tests, which is only to Cloudflare, yes. But IQI's bandwidth numbers are lower because it displays average utilization (i.e. shorter requests, like web browsing, mostly capped by latency) while the map displays connection capacity.
I believe the parent was referring to the lines for Oceania being surprisingly good considering we usually think of it as being far away from content (which is not true when a large chunk of it can be served from local datacenters).
On point - Its /wan-iz-tu-ex/ - referring to scale like 1:100, 1:500, 1:5 etc. In design, especially tangible design subjects like industrial design and architecture, everything is prototyped at some scale or proportions that is friendly to understand the design development.
If you have already considered this enough, disregard my comment..This name really trips me up as a german reader. If you like that it‘s a bit out there, that’s cool. If you want most people to read it like you just explained, you might need to capitalize the individual words.
Edit: just saw your logo. That reads well on first glance.
Could you take (embeddings of) frames from your query video and measure the pairwise similarity to frames from the reference videos, then rank by some summary function of that list of similarity scores?
