Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | muyuu's commentslogin

It's not like there's a moral high ground about not collaborating with the military. Unless you want to advantage America's adversaries, namely China, Putin's Russia and Iran's current regime. There's always this implicit, sometimes explicit, "war bad" childish political philosophy in posts like this. In reality war is a given and you have to be prepared to have the upper hand.

"War is a given" if your foreign policies dictate that outcome. It's not something always unavoidable but it isn't inevitable either.

The United States is one pretty warmongerish nation by any account.


> The United States is one pretty warmongerish nation by any account.

Compared to other modern nations, but compared to history vary peaceful.


War is bad. And our reality isn’t some unchanging truth. Our actions and choices, or apathy, help shape our reality.

It is not childish to aspire to be better.


You can explain that to the Ukrainians and tell them how they shouldn't have American technical superiority like Starlink and the American AI and data in their drones to survive another day.

I reread my comment. Nowhere did I suggest countries don’t defend themselves. Nor did I say we shouldn’t make war.

We should minimize war and try other alternatives. And maybe try diplomacy and longer term thinking. Plus governments should value the governed.

But countries and people always have the right to defend themselves from attackers as they see fit.


The technology is the same technology. Case in point: the Intel gathered from the tools named in the article and any AI/ML tools trained from it.

the EU has demonstrated for decades that by balancing trades, equality and human rights it can prevent conflicts from happening.

Seems to me that most of our friends in the balkans that have memory of the past wars are overall pretty happy about the current state of things, and there hasn't been wars to contend Alsace-Lorraine in 80 years, is it a record already?

War is very much not a given in the civilized world


To be more precise, two decades, from 1999 when EU countries bombed Yugoslavia and occupied Kosovo.

They also instigated and executed the coup in Libya.

That's why they have a full blown war in their borders and they're powerless without American hardware and intelligence. Also they're right now scrambling to allocate huge investments in weaponry, of course late, but better than never.

Full blown war: putin scared that more territories will want to join the EU block. No internal wars and more countries wishing to enter the block.

Powerless without american hardware and intelligence: You wish. Big tech is spending so much lobbying our governments in fear of us leaving them for open solutions, or god forbid paying fair amount of taxes.

And regarding intelligence, we would have been so much better without the CIA & co spying our politicians and messing with our governments, aiding and sponsoring domestic right wing terrorism for the past 50 years.


They're supplicants to NATO, a pathetic situation America shouldn't be striving to replicate.

I guess nuclear weapons were just inevitable the moment the first quarks were assembled into a proton, right?

if it can be used to murder people it will be.

the only reason we dont have antimatter weapons or gravity guns is because we haven't figured out how.


We have international treaties that ban biological and chemical weapons. Other weapons that are regulated include anti-personnel mines, cluster bombs, and blinding lasers. Expanding bullets are banned in military uses as are incendiary weapons against civilian targets.

That's the state today. Throughout history there's been a long negotiation about what weapons have been allowed in combat.


"war is a given" =/= "we should seek out wars"

it should be right in the title tbh, not after some 150 words of prose

i may be hallucinating this memory, but I'd swear the source was published in a magazine back in the day and i had this one

Yes, this isn't the original source code that produced the animation. It is verbatim the source code that was printed in the May 1987 Amiga World article, which was available as a floppy disk through post at the time. An ADF of the floppy first became available on the internet in 2014 through dottyflowers on English Amiga Board. It contains none of the animation code, none of the poses, none of the HAM, none of the blending, quanitzation, etc.

As an aside, I've spent the last 6 months recreating the original on classic hardware. Blogpost and binary in the works.

edit: no idea why this comment was flagged to deadness. 1 karma I suppose.



not when all it takes is not to actively boycott the device


Captchas are getting so annoying and puzzling they will soon prove you're unlikely to be human if you pass them.


Its only Google's ReCaptcha that sucks, with its eternal gaslighting.

"Select stairs": okay, does that mean the railing too? And probably some percentage of people clicked rails, so now I have meta it and guess if that percentage is enough to throw off my guess.

"Select motorbike": okay, but you're showing me a bicycle. I'll click "skip". FAIL. TRY AGAIN. Sighs.. okay, I guess the average person is so dim-witted they will misidentify a bicycle for a motorbike.


It’s not just Google. Look at Arkose, which are not only difficult for humans to solve, they’re difficult for humans to even understand (“move the particle to the correct orbit”).


> "Select stairs"

And the "correct" pictures all shows steps, not stairs.

> "Select motorbike"

And the "correct" pictures all show mopeds, not motorbikes.

Christ, don't get me stated on taxis that aren't black, fire hydrants that aren't a yellow H sign (apparently I'm supposed to look for something like a yellow painted R2D2) and WTF is a "crosswalk" (a pedestrian crossing?).


>with its eternal gaslighting.

That's not gaslighting.

>And probably some percentage of people clicked rails, so now I have meta it and guess if that percentage is enough to throw off my guess.

No, there are multiple accepted answers.


> That's not gaslighting.

It is gaslighting me into thinking I gave the wrong answer.

> No, there are multiple accepted answers.

Nope, even for very simple things like "select all fire hydrants" (which are extremely obvious) or "select all images with cars" (with the images only being images completely devoid of cars or only cars, no lorries or busses), you still get a fail.

I assume you work on Captchas, which makes it extra cute you're trying to gaslight me about the built-in gaslighting :). It is really obvious too because it doesn't happen when not using a privacy browser and/or VPN.

At any rate, I hope you internalize that your work has made everyone's everyday life a little more miserable. A net negative to society.


> select all fire hydrants" (which are extremely obvious)

Speak for yourself!

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fire+hydrant+uk&tbs=imgo:1...


I think my browsing habits may have changed, as I rarely see captchas. However, just the other day, my son was frustrated by one that he said had taken him fifteen or more tries, and he still hadn't succeeded.


Yeah, that is a very common complaint about Google's recaptcha. If they don't like you, they actually just send you through an infinite failure loop, even though you keep solving them correctly.


for unified memory, the dense models are way too slow and for local GPU-based setups, large MoE are too large but they're fine on unified memory systems

essentially, hardware is the main reason you may choose one or the other locally

i have a Strix Halo system so I will be trying this Dwarf Star 4 thingie eventually when i have some free time


That actually makes sense, because you cannot quit Finder. I haven't used macs for a couple years now but I'm taking your word for it. Finder hasn't been quittable for as long as i can remember, so you stop trying to quit it.


They overhired, and BTC prices not being actually in the tank won't save them.


BTC's price isn't the point. Crypto businesses are a shrinking niche (not counting cases like Binance, but those are exceptions), and VC money has moved on. Crypto had its shot but couldn't go mainstream. AI is a better bet now.


taking x20 to x40 the time RTN took? looking at the table at the bottom

if so that's a pretty drastic trade-off


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: