I wish people would stop discussing academia as a single experience. The variability between labs and programs is enormous and depends almost entirely on the PI.
There are lots of toxic, stressful companies with poor leadership in competitive fields, but I wouldn't say that "industry is terrible choice" or some other sweeping generalization. People can leave a bad company and still find a great fit somewhere else, just as people can leave bad academic labs and join a better one en route to a successful career.
IME, most of the toxic traits ascribed to academics may be sufficient for success, but they are not necessary. There are highly successful academics who go against all the stereotypes of publish or perish, overwork, or poor management skills.
There are lots of toxic, stressful companies with poor leadership in competitive fields, but I wouldn't say that "industry is terrible choice" or some other sweeping generalization. People can leave a bad company and still find a great fit somewhere else, just as people can leave bad academic labs and join a better one en route to a successful career.
IME, most of the toxic traits ascribed to academics may be sufficient for success, but they are not necessary. There are highly successful academics who go against all the stereotypes of publish or perish, overwork, or poor management skills.