You cut the line but still go through security.

Lol username checks out?

Claude was very easy to unsubscribe from. I barely use it anymore anyways, primarily use Gemini

I hope you aren't missing the point. My position is similar to the author. I WILL take responsibility for the code I push to production, and rather than input a prompt and roll the dice on the outcome, I am strategic in my prompts, ensuring the LLM has the right context each time I I voke it, some of that context being accurate descriptions of what I want built, and I am in charge of ensuring it has been properly vetted. Many times I will erase what the LLM has written and redo it, by myself depending on the situation.

Replace "LLM" with "IDE" and re-read. The LLM is another tool. Of course tools can't be held responsible, the person wielding the tool is.

> Many times I will erase what the LLM has written and redo it, by myself depending on the situation.

The contention here is that antirez doesn't think this is necessary anymore. 100% code gen, with the occassional "stepping in and tell the AI how to write a certain function"

Your position is more balanced and quite similar to https://mitchellh.com/writing/non-trivial-vibing

Humans average one police reported accident per 500,000 miles?!

TIL I'm incredibly unlucky.

You're not. All you need to do is look around a typical car park and count witness marks on car bumpers to know that accidents are extremely common. One study put the estimate at one "driving mistake" every 500 miles and one crash every 60,000 miles.

An insurance policy study estimates that the average person is involved in 3–4 collisions in their lifetime.

You’re just a bad driver;)

I would love something like this that puts me in my own shell. Like a light CTF that is really just shell commands rather than breaking into a VM

I went searching and realized overthewire has a bash specific course called "Bandit". Still a VM you SSH to

You won't be given a year's supply of medication.

You will be cursed with years of calling every pharmacy in town once a month to figure out which one has your medication in stock this time, and once you figure that out, you stay on the phone with them until you walk into the store to pick it up so they don't give it to someone else.

Plus now a lot of doctors are requiring drug tests to make sure you're taking it, but not too much, and not taking other drugs, including legal ones.

Why did you copy the dictionary's definition nearly perfectly, but then add "without logic"?

In many cases, the conservative approach to a problem is prudent because the old ways work whereas there is more risk and uncertainty with new.

That's not fear, it's wisdom.

Where does "providing a choice to people in tough situations" end? When is it wrong to terminate a life because you're in a tough situation?

That's the point of any ethical/moral discussions. Is self-defence a situation that does allow you to kill another person?

Does a mother who forgets to pull the hand break of the car and kills her son, should do jail time?

Does a police officer who shots and kills a person which is in a degraded mental state but threats his life, be accused of murdering?

Does a police officer who shoots a known murderer fugitive without following the standard procedure be prosecuted as a homicide?

See the point?