Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | meander_water's commentslogin

The crazy part is that none of this is unexpected.

This was exactly the reason why GPT-2 was restricted for general release in 2019.

Check out section 4 - https://cdn.openai.com/GPT_2_August_Report.pdf


Industrial Revolution? We're still here.

Nope. Did not replace the brain in general level.

Zeppelins are another notable one

I would have liked to see quality results between the different quantization methods - Q4_K_M, Q_8_0, Q_6_K rather than tok/s

I'm building this mostly to scratch my own itch

https://findsubstack.com

It's a newsfeed constructed from 130k substack RSS feeds but limited to the past 24h.

Its helping me discover writers other than just what the algorithm gives me.


I'm building this mostly to scratch my own itch https://findsubstack.com

A newsfeed for Substack posts from the past 24h. Its helping me discover writers other than just what the algorithm gives me.


https://findsubstack.com

I'm building this mostly to scratch my own itch.

A newsfeed for Substack posts from the past 24h. Its helping me discover writers other than just what the algorithm gives me.


Whoops didn't know about this, should have searched first

Not only is the article AI generated, it's recycling a shallow pov that hundreds of other people are just copying.

Just google "taste is the new moat"

Doesn't deserve to be on the front page.


I think this is a largely inflated PR stunt.

Opus 4.6 was already capable of finding 0days and chaining together vulns to create exploits. See [0] and [1].

[0] https://www.csoonline.com/article/4153288/vim-and-gnu-emacs-...

[1] https://xbow.com/blog/top-1-how-xbow-did-it


Absolutely not a PR stunt, talk to one of your friends working at partner companies with access to the model

I’m in the same boat as you. I believe the model is an improvement of course but I’ve been successfully bug finding 0 day hunting and red teaming with models for the last two years and while that’s impressive I have a feeling that this doomsaying/overhype is mostly marketing being that’s being amplified by non-security folks.

I don't see why you think this evidence makes this release less likely to be real, rather than more. It's a pretty straightforward scenario: Opus is already good at finding vulns, they scaled it up another OOM, they got something which is good enough at finding vulns to be a major threat.

I think you misunderstood, I do think it's real. I just think they're being disingenuous that this is a new threat. This is the same company that reported that their models were being used by a state actor to perform exploits in real-time - https://www.anthropic.com/news/disrupting-AI-espionage

They know how to run a good marketing campaign.


Did you read the article?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: