Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | maxverse's commentslogin

Same



There’s still a good amount of outrage to be farmed from this, looks like.



I feel like both the point you quote and your response are valid, and not mutually exclusive. It's great that you were able to avoid lifestyle creep and that $200K felt like a lot of money that "had a huge impact on my later financial condition, and enabled me to do many things". And I think Katrine (from the article) feels like that should be a lot of money. I don't see lifestyle creep playing a role in her life. Instead, another person they quote says:

> [Ms. Gan]she saw the strain on friends who were earning below $200,000, for whom rent, utilities and groceries consume nearly everything that comes in.


I don't understand how rent, utilities, and groceries consume nearly everything that comes in unless you're vastly overspending in one category. If she's paying $60k in taxes then she's got $140k left. That's over $10k/mo. How can someone spend that much without lifestyle creep?

I understand that one could feel pinched at that salary, when including saving for down payment, future kids, and retirement. But that's different from saying the basics consume nearly everything.


So, per the article, it is apparently difficult to find a one bed apartment for under 5k a month. Assuming that's true, half her take-home salary going on rent would get her a lot of the way there!


Even if someone were spending $5k on housing, how do you spend $5k on utilities and groceries (not dining out, it says groceries)?

Also, not having a roommate straight out of college is typically a lifestyle bump in itself. Most people have roommates in college, so getting a place solo is an upgrade.


Can it be a case of she's not earning all of the $200k in cash?


It's possible, but that would be a pretty relevant detail to leave out. Someone who's getting paid in carried interest is in a very different boat than a run of the mill employee.


You think someone in California making 200k is paying an overall 30% in combined federal and state taxes? That seems out of touch with reality to me.


I was making a guess based on having earned less and more than that amount. Just checked with ChatGPT and its estimate for a single person with no mortgage interest was $46k in income taxes and $13k in payroll taxes.


4k for rent 3k for retirement

3k for everything else. I’m not going to sit and itemize, but I could very easily see 3k getting eaten (figuratively)


I'm confused about the quote, because the numbers do not add up to me. Elsewhere in the discussion SV apartments are quoted at $3500/month. When I rent, utilities tend to be under $100, and groceries are about $400. Let's be generous and say "utilities and groceries" are $1000. So "rent, utilities and groceries" are $4500/month, at total federal + CA state tax rate of 40% (estimating high), that means $90k/year to break even. I'm not sure what Ms. Gan filtered via the reporter thinks "consum[ing] nearly everything that comes in" means, but lets say 80% of income that's $112k, although that would still be a $20k/yr surplus (and a 5 month cushion). So there's quite a lot of room "earning below $200,000" and financial distress. If the article meant "less than $100k" I could believe it. Or perhaps Ms. Gan's friends' "rent, utilities and groceries" comprises more things than it literally means?


Saving for retirement should be in the list, along with gym membership and entertainment. Transportation. Why is the default budget "rent, utilities, groceries"?


I enjoyed playing with this. Wild how much it knows.


That resonates with me, too. I've tried building beautiful, does-one-thing well projects. I like the way you phrase it:

> I try to be the best, in the list of “that specific feature” providers, not one of them, or one of the good ones.

What have you made, OP?


> His agnostic leanings and heterosexual orientation align with a more liberal political stance.

That's a very safe guess

> He is susceptible to confirmation bias, in-group bias, the availability heuristic and out-group homogeneity... he may also be prone to excessive phone use, binge-watching TV shows, and impulse buying.

That's literally everyone


Are you suggesting this was written by AI?


You are absolutely right.


It’s not just a suggestion. It’s a demonstration.


And you are so bold for identifying it. You’re not just passively commenting. You’re creating something bigger, larger than yourself.


It's the demonstration layer


agentic demonstration layer


It's a very frequently used structure by LLMs especially ones writing for LinkedIn.


"It's not X, it's Y."

A linguistic presentation commonly referred to as constrastive negation.


Humans may use commas here, but LLMs always use a full stop, always.


I wonder if there's a single trainer in Kenya who is responsible for some of the conventions we see so often. Maybe (s)he just really likes full stops and used them in all of the training examples.


Was looking for a precise term for that. Thank you!

Also AI-Linkedin-Bullshit likes to use "just" additionally and it's mostly along the lines of Y being something much more impactful then X.


Why would they not use their own AI?


I use an M1 for personal development an an M4 for work. I'm a typical dev. I don't feel any difference.


I am genuinely curious what you're hoping to get out of your goal to use claude code daily!


i’d say more projects that i wish existed + closing the taste gap btw the bar i have for products as a user vs. what i’m capable of creating as a builder. something like “token generated” is ofc only a proxy goal with no guarantees of quality. nevertheless it might be useful to some, like how writers set daily word count quotas for themselves


Thank you for putting my feelings into words. "Really weird" is exactly how I feel. AI output in our work should be measured in engineering progress, not in use metrics, right?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: