Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kimos's commentslogin

You’re describing changing the base assumption for software reachable on the internet. “Assume all possible unauthenticated urls will be hit basically constantly”. Bots used to exist but they were rare traffic spikes that would usually behave well and could mostly be ignored. No longer.

If it’s legit you can ask your ISP if they sell use of your hardware. Or just don’t use the provided hardware and instead BYO router or modem or media converter or whatever.

But I think what OP is implying is insecure hardware being infected by malware and access to that hardware sold as a service to disreputable actors. For that buy a good quality router and keep it up to date.


So you don't know? Why respond?

Don't be rude.

But now you can use it again!

My favourite starter word has come and gone. So I’m in the opposite situation where I feel relieved to be able to go back to using it.

> it’s only true use is to anonymize payments

The irony of this is that since every transaction and all its metadata is on chain, it has turned out to be easily traced back to the beginning of time. Fully open, the opposite of anonymized. (see: Chainalysis et. al.)


Malicious compliance.

This works on any iPhone? It mounts the non-privileged DCIM folder or whatever over USB to somewhere on your filesystem? With write access?




It is a pain.

I’ve wrapped it in some short scripts which notifies on auth failure and it’s an easy process to run the auth script. But there’s no way to avoid the bi-monthly inconvenience I don’t think.


I’ve used this tool for years and it’s great. But it really saves just the raw data. You’d never get it back in to Apple Photos as nice as when you pulled it out. Metadata is missing. Live Photos come out as an image and a similarly named video. But I treat it as the emergency backup. If some Apple DC burns down or they ban my Apple ID for some reason, at least the photos still exist.


Cookie pops are malicious compliance to regulations that legitimately protect consumers. You’ve cherry picked one bad side effect to throw out all the ways the EU is way ahead of anyone else in protecting consumers, most of which you don’t even notice because it’s hard to notice harm that did not happen.


That's fair. I live in the EU and I love it here, and I'm glad for those protections every day. Except the damn cookie popup.

I don't agree they're malicious compliance though. I think it's just regular compliance.


Regular compliance would be be to stop tracking users.

A ton of websites don’t even track users but have the cookie popup because they think that’s what you’re supposed to do.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: