Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | johng's commentslogin

I used to eat Wendy's quite often. I am a real fast food lover. About 2 years ago, maybe a bit more I noticed the quality of the food dropping. Since they started leaving the skins on their fries I liked them less. They changed the recipe on the Spicy Chicken sandwich a long time ago and it went downhill. They recently revamped it and it's even worse. I no longer eat there.

Burger King on the other hand has made some changes recently and it has definitely gotten better.

So, definitely not surprised by this.


This requires no port forwarding, so someone brute force scanning your IP won't find this and your open port. they also might have a harder time figuring out what service has been exposed since the port number itself will be unknown.

When I was a young kid (born in 78, was probably 4th or 5th grade) I wrote a letter to the President. I can't remember who was in office at the time. But I got a letter back and they addressed me as "Master <Last Name>" which was a formal title at the time. I hadn't heard it before but I remember looking up what it meant and why they would use that term.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_(form_of_address)


I get a headache every time I use VR. I wanted to love it. I'm an avid video gamer and have been all my life. Can do marathon sessions playing games on a TV or monitor. 5 minutes of VR and I have a massive headache. I've tried a couple different VR headsets as well.

I have a slightly large nose and did some research, I never got the chance to try this but this might have helped. https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/archive/releases/2015/Q1/vir...


Lots of people haul things. The US is huge compared to what most people expect. Big trucks can be a necessity depending on what you do for a living/your way of life.

The vast majority of pickups are not actually used for workmen like purposes.

In fact, as carmakers have started pivoting more towards selling them to affluent suburban households, the usable cargo volume has decreased over time despite increasing size.


> Lots of people haul things.

Not with pick-up trucks they don't:

> Nearly 90 percent of truck buyers said they never use their truck for business towing, as a mobile office, or as a work site. Yet nearly 40 percent said they drive their truck strictly for pleasure at least once a week.

* https://www.carscoops.com/2025/11/capability-by-numbers-what...

* https://www.powernationtv.com/post/most-pickup-truck-owners-...

And these are self-reported numbers: what people say about their own behaviour(s).

> Big trucks can be a necessity depending on what you do for a living/your way of life.

For something like ~90% of pick-up owners that is grocery shopping and errands. As one headline put it, most folks don't need a pick-up truck but rather a cowboy costume:

> But, as it turns out, a significant portion of truck owners never use their trucks for these capabilities. According to Edwards’ data, 75 percent of truck owners use their truck for towing one time a year or less (meaning, never). Nearly 70 percent of truck owners go off-road one time a year or less. And a full 35 percent of truck owners use their truck for hauling—putting something in the bed, its ostensible raison d’être—once a year or less.

* https://www.thedrive.com/news/26907/you-dont-need-a-full-siz...

People would do better to buy a more fuel efficient vehicle, and use the money saved to rent a truck (or van) the few times a year they need those specific capabilities. They'd probably save money, and we'd probably have fewer dead people and children as well:

* https://carbuzz.com/news/the-abrams-m1-tank-has-better-visib...


Things can be hauled just fine in an estate, saloon, or even a hatchback. European camper vans are regularly hauled by tiny Golfs or Polos with barely a litre of engine displacement and a hundred kilowatts of power.

Americans just buy much bigger vehicles than necessary.


>Big trucks can be a necessity depending on what you do for a living/your way of life.

You might have missed this part. My round bales are 1000kg, and the field gets wet. How do I move the goats? How do I pull someone out of that ditch where the sign says 15mph but every winter they slide through my fence?


A tractor, probably.

Grew up in farm country and on a (hobby) cattle farm, can confirm, the best tool for between two and three[1] of those is a tractor.

Though yes obviously if you have an actual working farm, in any capacity, you need a truck that can tow trailers with decent weight on them.

I have noticed truck ownership patterns vary with region, which may be why some people bristle at the notion that vanity-driven truck ownership is common. It's extremely common in the Midwest, city suburbs are full of people who bought an expensive truck either because that's the purchase that'll get them positive attention from their peers at work or in their friend group (and because other options for show-off cars might get them ribbing instead of kudos) or for aspirations they'll never fulfill ("yeah, I'll totally tow a boat to the lake every weekend! Maybe I'll even buy a fifth-wheel camper!" then they end up doing it like twice a year and never buy the camper). It's less common in (at least large parts of) the Northeast. The "I have a nice car people may comment positively on or otherwise approve of" purchases here swing more Volvo and Audi and such, even out in what the locals consider the "country" (it's... not, LOL).

[1] Where are the goats being hauled? Just on your property, between fields? To somewhere farther away? On roads? How far on roads? Truck still might be the wrong tool, or at least not better.


If you are really a farmer then I would expect you to have more sense than defending all the people who drive to their office job in their massive trucks.

Yes people on farms need big vehicles. We're not talking about them.


With anything but an F350. How did farmers do anything before Ford saved them with the worst trucks to ever exist, truly a wonder.

My mother has rheumatics and she was looking at an SUV for her back. It gets more difficult for old people to climb into a tiny car- and for old people a car is a lifeline. Lots of big cars are driven by small old ladies and it has nothing to do with vanity.

The solution is not an SUV, but an MPV.

In almost no situation are pickup trucks, SUVs, or even a crossover the correct kinds of vehicle.


Yep. If you are under 30 in the UK and you have more possessions than can fit in one trip in a Fiesta with the seats down, you have too much stuff.

Right, but seeing trucks obviously not set up for towing or hauling is becoming more common nowadays. With the level of luxury trims available on some trucks now, it's obvious that they aren't a necessity anymore.

This is on top of trucks prioritizing 4 door models and taking bites out of the truck bed


Same trend here in NZ. People buying utes/trucks just because they want, not because they need. They're not as big as the American F150s etc, more a Toyota Hilux or Ford Ranger.

And they're often driven by reckless road ragers, often modified with uncertified suspension, bush lights turned on at night blinding oncoming traffic, and wheels extending past the fender flares. These vehicles are often financed to the hilt, so spending money on certifying the modifications is out of the picture, so a lot of these are not legal to drive on the roads.


Remember that the US is it's own market with different regulations and has a complicated history with imports, so no Hilux. Though it does look like the Ranger is externally the same between NZ and US. I'm not counting maybe 1mm as different.

I am somewhat familiar with a Ute since I've seen Subaru Bajas before. Not old enough to see Subaru Brats around or El Caminos.

It does seem like those people are emulating Americans though a lot of those mods are passable without certification, and it's up to a cop to pull over people using bush lights (they probably won't).


My comment wasn't necessarily to talk about model parity across markets - more to highlight the growing trend of people buying large utility vehicles with a tray as a fashion statement (for lack of a better term) than for its utility.

> "a lot of those mods are passable without certification" Not true. Besides the bush lights, any changes in suspension and wheel size require a certification, with a LVVTA cert plate attached to the vehicle.

There is definitely a case of double standards with police enforcement. 'Boy racers' with modified coupes and sedans - typically lowered, with larger wheels - get way police scrutiny compared to utes with obviously illegal modifications like colored lights, and wheels jutting out past the fenders.


My bad, I meant in the US.

> so no Hilux

Isn't that just a Toyota Tacoma?


Tacoma is longer and wider by about 100mm. The Tacoma shares a platform with the Prado, no 2 door/2 seat option (anymore), no chassis cab, no diesel. Heard that it uses C channel frame, while the Hilux is fully boxed, so the payload is significantly better on the Hilux.

Sell sheet for the Tacoma vs the Hilux on Wikipedia states that there's an increased focus on ride quality over the Hilux, which was developed for the US market.


That may be true. However it does not explain how many people have big trucks that are never used as trucks

they want big vehicles to carry their big ego

Lots of people haul things everywhere. Driving a truck as your main vehicle because you haul something twice a month is ridiculously wasteful, of money foremost.

I have a small trailer, rent a bigger one or van when needed.


What do you think is the % of people having F150 that really do need F150?

As someone who does not own an F150 (or any truck), I find myself frequently wishing I had a truck, and either borrowing a friend with a truck, renting a truck, or doing some really unsafe things with my hatchback while muttering with my wife that our next car with be a truck.

If we had a truck, what % of the time would we be using it for things that can only be done with a truck? Very little, since it would also be our daily driver, but even if just 1% of the time, it's 100% worth having a truck over some sedan (or a hatchback!)


As someone who until last year has only had (mostly sports) cars or motorbikes, I now have a ute and it’s awesome to be able to do ‘ute stuff’ with it. Carrying toolboxes, transporting large/heavy/dirty cargo, collecting firewood, going off-roading and camping. I use it way more than I thought I would.

Likewise with my Jeep Gladiator. I traveled, hauled and camped with it more than I ever expected.

The bed is only 5 feet long but I'm thinking of taking out part of the back seat for even more room .

I also used 4x4 in 4H mode more than I thought on bad roads even though I didn't go truly off-road that much so no need for 4L. I did take advantage of the higher wheel clearance and the more rugged suspension and the 8-speed manual shifting is useful going down mountain roads.


Tbh as someone who does not drive or own a car regularly, I get by renting those U Haul vans (not trucks). It’s not expensive and it’s a hell of a lot more useful than a truck for doing the random heavy odd job.

Can't be more than 1% at this point. The cleanest cars on the road, and the only rough terrain they face is climbing kerbs to bypass queues in traffic.

What % of people who have wealth really need that wealth?

Not sure I follow.

Apart from feigned ignorance, a common trope is arguing X vehicle isn’t used optimally in a way they agree with and thus isn’t necessary to own.

I was pointing out the logical destination of this.


Numerous stats show truck owners don’t use their trucks to tow or haul stuff.

At least 50% don’t need a truck. There is maybe a 30% that do use their trucks to actually tow and haul on a regular basis.

Imagine replacing 50% of pick up trucks with fuel efficient or EV vehicules.


But how much of what you own is do you actually "need."

People are welcome to do with there money things that simply make them happy. That is a good and proper use of money.

This would be a very boring life indeed if people were only allowed to own things that others decided they need.


It's wild to see all these people clowning on truck owners... and then say they are going to buy two 5090's for local AI even though they know it's less efficient than a cloud and don't necessarily need the privacy aspect of it... but want to do it just "cuz" . The hypocrisy here is amazing.

I think you guys are comparing apples to oranges.

It’s wild you don’t realize it.


This senior citizen doing stuff got me. I bought a pair of cow slippers because I thought he was making them from his farm in Australia. Turns out they use that same "character" to hawk multiple products.

Unfortunately at this point I assume that everything I see online is fake until I have a good reason to think otherwise.

YouTuber Pleasant Green has several videos about all those fake ads making rounds. The one about fake old people is this one:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=f9MbhNJ5EIU


Every risk the early AI researchers warned us about came true, the companies released it anyway and here we are.

This would be ideal. I've been reading about Moonlight a lot lately, and it's many children. I'm building a new home theater set up and will be trying it soon.

She couldn't afford to retire in California. The cost of living in many other states is much lower. I can assure you, for example, that the cost of living in my home state (New Mexico) is very cheap.

The cost of living in new mexico is more than just a price tag. Portugal is only dysfunctional and hopeless for people trying to start a career, it's a great place for tourists and retirees.

I have an iPhone Air, which starts at $1099. The Duo has 3 screens, I can understand that price increase. I don't think the price is that unreasonable, especially with memory and cpu prices shooting up since I purchased the iPhone Air. I am disappointed that it doesn't have Face ID though.

I think they've changed the recipes since I was younger but we used to take a bunch of Nyquil or Robitussin... they had DXM in them and they would definitely make you feel euphoric if you took enough. The street term at the time was 'going robo'.

Did a quick search and found this: https://www.healthline.com/health/robotripping


Normally people robo-tripping buy Delsym now since it only contains DXM. I remember doing it a few times as a teenager, would have a fun night hallucinating the craziest things, listening to music was like a full body experience. The next day you'd be left with this "glow" that just made you extremely happy, assuming due to the increase in serotonin.


I remember hearing about people chugging cough syrup for a "Robobuzz" and I could not bring myself to do it. It seemed to be the most unpleasant way of altering my state.


It was work. You had to force it down. After doing it enough times you get used to it I guess. I could never stand alcohol and never understood it... beer neither. After drinking it enough, I understood it. Definitely not a good thing on either account.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: