Insane!

Nah, they wouldn't have released deepseek open source if they were the case

How are you sure about that? Undercutting your competition (at cost even) to minimize their power is a common strategy.

They'd be running in the red then cause they charge way less than Claude. Sorry but it just doesn't make logical sense. They have open source, papers, and self hosting too

Honestly a unique searchable name is better. I type in racket and results are mixed with tennis and I need to suffix "Language"

There is a naming tradition in the Lisp world, which Racket devs apparently have chosen over searchability.

Qualities or activities that have negative connotations. Guile. Gauche. Larceny. Racket.

I think it started with theorem provers - Planner, Conniver. Then Scheme[r].

I don't think Gauche fits there. There is a tradition of naming with synonyms for "scheme" (as in a criminal enterprise) like the others you listed, with some more peripheral ones like Gambit, Ruse, Artifice.

A funny thing was, when the rename to Racket was still fairly new, someone started looking into adopters in the finance space.

well, i also have to type "rhombus language" to get relevant results for the rhombus language

.NET/.NET Core/.NET Framework migration is painful because of this. VS/VSCode is sometimes only possible with AI’s help.

What? I know what you're taking about but it's literally only 1 dude(Matthias vs Butterick) who has chilled down for the most part Everyone else is fine. Do you have the source for others being toxic?

I think this is one of the few cases where there isn't a grift. It's open source, open research, there's not much to hide? Honestly official statements are pretty tame, it's the people who spin them for media headline clicks that are warping reality

Where does it say it will train on private? This seems like a security nightmare if it trains on hardcoded keys

Having hardcoded keys is a security nightmare regardless.

Interesting, I thought performance was lower than zen 1. I wonder if they'll ever catch up

DJI is a global drone company and they're popular in Japan as well for agricultural drones . I recall the head of the American branch Colin Guuin, wanted more share and control of the company and they booted him out and he started his own drone company which is not doing so well

Hong Kongers would very much like to choose their own leadership. I understand that you're arguing from a mainland Chinese perspective, but in so doing you're ignoring the people who ought to have the most to say.

I used to have your viewpoint, but after reading Lee Kuan Yew, and after several hours of cross referencing various interviews with the pro-rioters/hk democracy, and pro-engagement/neutral hongkongers, I conclude that most of the pro-rioters like Joshua Wong/Jimmy Lai at large fail to articulate anything of value other than "I want to turn the system upside-down" , while pro-engagement/neutral people know they want upward social mobility and more government involvement in fixing the housing and employment crisis.

Good for you. But I didn't refer to any specific pro-democracy figure. I am advocating for free and open elections where everyone, pro-mainland or localist, can choose the direction of the city.

That's the tragedy of Hong Kong. They never got the sympathy of the mainland.

And I cannot escape the feeling that a lot of Americans believe that a democratic China would be friends with the US...

Who exactly is "friends" with the US at the moment? Maybe Israel?

In Trumps world it mostly seems you are either an asset or a liability. They do no want a multipolar world.

Who brought up America?

> advocated military assistance to coup the government

Is there source evidence for this? I keep hearing various different things Jimmy supposedly advocated or asked for, but very little actual source.

You claimed he urged top US officials to give military assistance to a coup. This video is just him pleading to the US public "They'll listen to you because you're as powerful as they are".