Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hodanli's commentslogin

worst is graphic settings for games. needs PhD to understand.

They just need 3 settings for games, 1) make room hot, 2) make room warm, 3) maintain room temperature.

I use that first setting to keep my basement living room warm in the winter.

Can I convert LaTeX templates to Typst and vice versa? Many journals have LaTeX templates and demand LaTeX.


Eastern cultures say the same thing about the influence of the West. Ha!


Because people don’t respect that which they feel they have no connections to or shared community with. The Kumbaya of multiculturalism only goes so far. Assimilation is a requirement, not just a nice thing.


Which eastern cultures?


Same here. I still use conda from time to time for this.


i like logseq as somewhat modern iteration of org-mode


What lead you to choose that over say obsidian, notion, Joplin, and the many others that pretty much do the same thing?


I switched from Obsidian to Logseq because Logseq has better block-level support, better embedded image previews, and more functionality out of the box without having to rely on plugins

Why not Notion or Joplin? I like Logseq's outline format better than Joplin's long-form note taking format, and I just don't like Notion at all for purely subjective reasons.


Orgmode is more than just a note keeping tool, it is a complete and complex toolbox. I can use tables like a spreadsheet, include source code snippets, etc.

Joplin is fine, especially for shared note keeping. We store its notes on a private WebDAV server and everyone in the family can access these notes from their laptops or mobile devices.

But the editing capabilities of Joplin are dismal. Try to swap lines (on a smartphone, no mouse), change the same term in a number of notes, or do some more complex editing operations. These are easily done in emacs/orgmode, even on a smartphone or tablet ... ,at least with emacs running in Termux under Android.


They do not do the same thing.

Logseq is an outliner (though it does have a document mode), which means a deep interaction with the document‘s hierarchy: You can zoom into blocks, collapse them (not ephemerally, it’s saved in the document) and link to them.

I’d probably use Obsidian if it had those features (since Logseq is still as buggy as it was years ago), but the last time I checked it did not.


I wonder why they phased out Pydantic in structured output for the Responses API.


Hey there! This is Steve here from the OpenAI team–I worked on the Responses API. We have not removed this! It should still work just like before! Here's an example:

https://github.com/openai/openai-python/blob/main/examples/r...


Hi Steve,

I based my assumption on the examples in the documentation[^1]. It is great that we can still use that.

1. https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/structured-outputs?a...


(Shameless plug) I worked on something for anyone else wanting to get structured outputs from LLMs in a model agnostic way (Including Open AI models): https://github.com/inferablehq/l1m


it is more similar to logseq's journey. you can give it a try.


same here


Ty for the heads up. I think I identified the issue (not, sure why it was affecting some users and not others). Updated! Might take a little time to propagate.


Definitely makes Firefox irreplaceable for me.


Memex is the tool I use for a similar purpose, but I still cannot find a link that I know I saved. I think this problem is not solved yet.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: