Don't fall into the AI hype.

It's about keeping google's device secure *from* the user.

Of course it would be better.

it has a lot of sketchy telemetries

It's really bad for security.

The problem is vulnerable dependencies and having to update hundreds of binaries when a vuln is fixed.

"HN dismisses study without understanding it"

This is 100% false.

Once supply chain attacks enter your threat model, you suddenly realize that the entire internet breaks if any one of a few hundred volunteer owned home computers are compromised.

Fixing this requires universal reproducible builds redundantly built and signed by independently controlled hardware. Once you have that then you no longer have single points of failure so centralized high security colo cost becomes a moot issue.

> Coding AIs design software better than me, review code better than me, find hard-to-find bugs better than me, plan long-running projects better than me, make decisions based on research, literature, and also the state of our projects better than me

ChatGPT, is that you?

...because food is not infrastructure.

Neither is water, they obviously meant food production and distribution infrastructure