Why is that? I've seen couple of small firms using hetzner very successfully and saving a lot of money compared to whatever cloud offering.

I have used LN quite a lot for the last 3-4 years or so. Seems to work good enough for quite many use cases.

> This of course cannot be done with normal cash.

Normal cash is just printed out from thin air by those who have the power. In that sense (some) cryptocurrencies are better because at least the process is open.

Fiat money is proof of stake, except the failure mode is economic collapse or military collapse.

Running computer power costs a lot more than thin air.

What about bitcoin

I'm OpenClaw user and I never would do that. You can do with OpenClaw that, but it is definitely not the only use case, and I would argue that not even the one that makes sense overall. Most people want to be careful which decisions you want to outsource and which not, and you can direct the AI to work however you prefer. Personally I have developed some projects with OpenClaw, and it does have very limited permissions.

There are like 10 openclaw clones out there. If you prefer security over features, just pick up another one.

They exist; are any of them secure?

Or you can just make your own. The core pattern is not difficult to clone.

I use it for a side project. I just put it on VPS, and then it edits the code and tests it. The nice thing is that I can use it on the go whenever I have spare moment. It is addictive, but way better addiction than social media IMO.

The thing where you give it access to all your personal data and whatever I haven't done and wouldn't do.

I can do this with Claude Code from my phone. What’s the difference?

> Digging up the data from example the 135k instances in the open reeks like bullshit, I would suspect several other claims are exaggerated as well.

Do you so stringently examine most CVEs? I’ll bet you don’t. Are you a big fan of this project? I’ll bet you are. Do you have any actual data to counter what they said or do you just sort of generally not vibe with it? If so, now would be a great time to break it out while this is still fresh. If not…

They are pointing out the data provided does not appear to be real. There is no credible link to this 135k number. They do not need to provide a number, as one does not appear to exist.

Well the post was removed so that’s not very promising on their part.

The 135k instances is likely not true at all.

I have used openclaw pretty long but at no point it has proposed doing anything like that.