Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cocoa19's commentslogin

For people already owning an iPhone, you can make it a dumb phone if you own a mac.

Turn on iPhone supervised mode (requires factory reset), then create and load a profile with Apple Configurator on macOS.

You can disable installing apps, just certain apps, or just block certain websites. If you want to ban TikTok and Reddit but not give up your banking app, you can do it. You want no browser, you got it.


I thought you were going to say out of pocket costs are much much higher than that.

I’ll be lucky if I get a specialist for under 500 until I meet deductible of 3k+ for a family of 3. One emergency room visit and we reach it in one or two days.


Removing the watermark usefulness depends on your use case.

If you care to avoid detection, yes, it is useful. If you care about the best possible sequence of words, then the damage is already done once watermarked.


Didn't realize it until now, but you're right.

LOC is dead, long live token usage.


Emergencies. If you are responsible for children or needy adults, and they are not with you, you better respond after multiple tries.

At least that's what a regular Joe like me would do, I don't know what high in power people do.


For the owner/shareholders yes.

The workers will see the fun evaporate but now they have to clean 10x cookie trays in the same 8 hours.


Can confirm.

Say what you will about Tim Ferris, but maybe he was onto something when he said only learn the bare minimum to get something done and more than that is a waste (4 hour workweek).


He says that, but in practice he ends up learning everything he can, in order to try and figure out the bare minimum to keep doing.


We must not be using the same opus 5, because if I tried to generate this it would refuse based on copyright grounds.


Karpathy works for Anthropic so he obviously has full access to everything, and doesn’t have to pay for token burn either.


I saw that "~free" and laughed.


> On hallucinations, I'd push back on the framing a bit. > It's not a perfect answer, but it's a serious one.

Thanks Claude!


At this point, the papers, reviews and defense are all done by bots.

From the paper, "we collected feedback from 15 to 20 frequent users". Is it 15 or 20?

I lot of interpretive claims, it reads more like a marketing case study.


Ugh too fucking late. What a privacy nightmare.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: