Let's imagine I have a blog and put something along these lines somewhere on every page: "This content is provided free of charge for humans to experience. It may also be automatically accessed for search indexing and archival purposes. For licensing information for other uses, contact the author."

If I then get hit by a rude AI scraper, what chances would I have to sue the hell out of them in EU courts for copyright violation (uhh, my articles cost 100k a pop for AI training, actually) and the de facto DDoS attack?

If the scraper is based (Or has meaningful assets) in the EU, then your chances are good. If they do not, then the lawsuit would be meaningless.

>it doesn't even have to be free software AFAIK, just the source has to be visible to everyone

With the implication that MS is free to harvest it for LLM training?

Lunar Lake had integrated RAM, right? Given certain market realities right now, it could be a real boon for them if they keep that design.

What if your PC dies?

hrm, the only PCs I've had died was from a cursed case.

I did have a laptop die because I let it get a little wet.

But when you look at the history of memory, etc, it's certainly going to come back down once the bubble subsides.

How do you paste the selected text if you want to replace a text selection in the other window?

ElysiaJS's blog claims that support for other runtimes was added in 1.2: https://elysiajs.com/blog/elysia-12.html#adapter

Thanks I wasn't aware of this

I really liked the chill vibe and it ran surprisingly well for a 3D browser game. Are there any "secrets" besides the alien, space ship and the girl on the roof who talks about Three.js?

Isn't that actually SolidJS?

https://solidjs.com

Solid is definitely in that “compile-to-direct-DOM” camp, and I think it’s awesome — it shows how far you can push the reactive model with JSX + fine-grained updates.

dagger.js is coming from the opposite direction: no compiler, no JSX, and also no signals. just plain HTML with attributes like +click / +load. You drop in a <script> from a CDN and it wires up behavior at runtime. It’s more about zero build friction and “view-source-ability”than squeezing out maximum perf.

So if Solid is about compiling React-like ergonomics down to efficient DOM transforms, dagger is about skipping compilation entirely and letting you glue components together with HTML. Two very different trade-offs, but complementary ends of the spectrum.

"I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops." -Stephen Jay Gould

I see where this quote is coming from… but Einstein is a bad example. His success was not from golden Stanford opportunities.

Every life decision was him opting out of responsibility and prestige to spend more time on his interests.

So “people of equal talent, and commitment to their work at the cost of all other qualities of life including relationships” looks very different than that quote wants to suggest.

The quote seems quite on the nose to me. Einstein wasn't raised by paupers.

No, he just was forced to be a refugee from his own country. Do we really have to compare suffering?

The context of this discussion is an argument that we need to find the Albert Einstein of the world to help them go to Stanford. My argument is that Einstein never went to the proverbial Stanford. In fact he avoided those things.

Einstein was a patent clerk rather than a professor. He explicitly chose not to “go to Stanford”.

Linux may have won on phones, but free software did not, which is the thing that actually matters.

That’s a different issue but you have a point esp since the Linux vs windows fight back then was essentially framed as proprietary vs free.