If they were equivalent, people would be committing the prompts and not the code

And then getting bugs when they use a new version of the AI, just like people occasionally got bugs when they upgraded to new versions of the compiler...

and what's the tesla equivalent for the BYD dolphin?

There's more than one brand of car available in America... so it would probably be the Chevy Volt, the nissan leaf, or hyundai kona

Recently, I have used both Zed[0] and VSCode[1] remotely via SSH. It works just fine, and it was painless to set up. I remember years ago last time I tried, it was a much harder process.

[0] https://zed.dev/docs/remote-development [1] https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/ssh

In Emacs it's been easy for a long time. Just use /ssh:user@host:path/to/file and it appears local. The added advantage, which I am not sure is supported by most editors is that if you want you can use the remote environment for builds, tests, etc. Like if I C-c C-c a defun it gets compiled and updated in the remote running image.

I'll believe that LLMs are like compilers the day a repo contains only the prompts and no generated code.

While I agree in principle (slack works just fine as a firefox tab, thank you very much), if the application needs filesystem access, it's not going to be viable.

Doesn't Tauri fix this?

Is that not a partly solved problem? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/File_System...

It's not evenly distributed. Big labels get much better payouts per listen than independent artists

I guess such an old edition is in the public domain

really? there are ways of putting music on Spotify that don't involve paying a fee upfront at any time?

Yes, last I checked at least LANDR, Amuse and Tunecore all had plans where you release for free and they take a % of royalties.

Yes, lots.

the film they were using for these pictures allows for way higher resolution scans than 1080p