They might be, but that’s not really a reason to let bad people stay in jobs they shouldn’t have. Otherwise e might as well give up any pretense of accountability and just let them do whatever they want.

And I didn't say she should remain.

I'm not sure about the "bad people" characterization though. Certainly she is a terrible person but if you are interested in having the least terrible AG you need to worry about her replacement. If by "bad people" you mean people who betrayed the electorate, I think she's been an extremely faithful advocate of the MAGA agenda.

Considering the president is unable to acknowledge anything that could be regarded as unflattering, I think it's safe to say we voted away the pretense of accountability.

I think quite a lot of MAGA wanted the complete release of the Epstein files, so maybe not extremely faithful to the electorate...

I think that was just a meaningless rally chant like "build the wall" and "no new wars". Why would they vote for the guy's friend and possible client if they actually wanted the files released (and predators prosecuted)?

There was also SpaceWar! from MIT, which Nolan Bushnell turned into a standalone cabinet game. Though I think you could make a case for Pong being the first coin-op video game, a commercial game rather than something that primarily existed in academic labs.

Which would be fine. But the article is written as if Pong was the first video game period, which it clearly wasn't.

consumer space and space space chips.

Just gotta zoom _way_ in to make the text readable, though.

I spent years as a freelance proofreader and copyeditor. One of the reasons I don't so much any more is I was getting too many political books, books where the authors were not so interested in facts or logic--or even internal consistency. Most of these books were 'conservative' but this was not exclusively a right-wing issue. Ideology requires glossing over the complexity of the real world. It's draining to read this stuff, with limited ability to make corrections.

Hell, now I work for a uni press, and I'm seeing this in our own list more and more--writers are giving up on deep analysis.

"The fight has been about the Pentagon wanting to use Anthropic’s models even more than the company wants, which doesn’t seem like the thing you’d fight for if you thought the models presented security risks."

Well, remember who's running the show there.

I know this is a developer, so they're never going to suggest anything except number go up, but if the cost to buy is going up faster than the cost to rent, that suggests a distortion in the market that is not entirely about housing supply. Which means, number may go down. We have seen this movie before.

"More than 30 meters long, it filled a 9 m by 15 m room and weighed about 30 kilograms."

It was a balloon?

I suppose responding with 'AI;DR' would seem rude?